...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sriwijaya Law Review >Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand the Process of Local Legislation in Indonesia
【24h】

Applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework to Understand the Process of Local Legislation in Indonesia

机译：应用宣传联盟框架了解印度尼西亚本地立法的过程

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Making regulation is the primary function of the modern state. Current praxis shows how there is positive and negative cooperation among policy participant in the process of local legislation. Many Indonesian scholars give attention to the politics of law and citizens participation in understanding this process. However, they do not give detail analysis on cooperation among policy participant during the legislation process. Drawing on qualitative methods, this article applies the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) to understand the process of local legislation in South Sumatra Province. This article selects The Provincial Regulation of South Sumatera No. 8 of 2016 on the Forest Fires Mitigation as a case study due to the nature of forest fires as the public problem that obtains attention from various actors. Several key informants representing the executive and the legislative at the local level is selected using the purposive technique as a source of primary data. The secondary data is collected from the official publication of the policy participant, newspaper, and social media. Using interactive models and NVIVO software to code and analyse research data, this article finds that the secondary policy belief (SPB) among policy participant could be similar partially or wholly. This similarity is the foundation of policy participant to make an advocacy coalition. This article identifies two advocacy coalition in legislation process of The Provincial Regulation of South Sumatera No. 8 of 2016 on the Forest Fires Mitigation: ‘the local wisdom’ coalition vs. ‘the no burning policy' coalition. This article discusses the findings and propose a new agenda for further research on local legislation process
机译：制定规定是现代国家的主要职能。目前的普拉西斯展示了当地立法过程中的政策参与者之间的积极和负面合作。许多印度尼西亚学者关注法律和公民参与了解这一进程的政治。但是，在立法过程中，他们没有对政策参与者之间的合作进行详细分析。借鉴定性方法，本文申请宣传联盟框架（ACF）以了解南苏立特省的当地立法的过程。本文选择了2016年南泉南8号森林火灾减缓的省级监管，以森林火灾本质为一种案例研究，作为从各行为者引起关注的公共问题。使用目的地技术作为主要数据来源选择代表执行执行和在本地层面的立法的关键信息人员。从政策参与者，报纸和社交媒体的官方出版中收集二级数据。使用互动模型和NVIVO软件来编码和分析研究数据，本文认为，政策参与者之间的二级政策信念（SPB）可能是部分或全部的。这种相似之处是政策参与者制定倡导联盟的基础。本文确定了两项宣传联盟，在省南泉省第8号省森林火灾减灾的南部苏马特第8号立法进程中：“本地智慧”联盟与“无燃烧政策”联盟。本文讨论了调查结果，并提出了新的议程，以进一步研究当地立法过程

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号