...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sriwijaya Law Review >Public Policy Defense and the Arbitrability of Competition Disputes Under the Philippine Arbitration Regime
【24h】

Public Policy Defense and the Arbitrability of Competition Disputes Under the Philippine Arbitration Regime

机译：菲律宾仲裁制度下的公共政策辩护与竞争纠纷的可仲裁

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The arbitrability of anti-competition disputes in the Philippines remains to be tested. It is since the Philippine Competition Act is relatively at its infancy, and cases are yet to be brought before the courts. This area entails much complexity considering that competition disputes are by nature imbued with public policy concerns, a mandatory exception for arbitration. This paper aims to examine the arbitrability of competition disputes under the Philippine domestic arbitration regime. After conducting an examination of cases and literature both in the Philippines and abroad, the paper argues that the Philippines may consider the US and French positions as to the arbitrability of competition disputes despite the presence of various public policy concerns. The public policy issues should only be taken into consideration when an arbitral award is brought before judicial bodies for recognition and enforcement and should not bar domestic arbitral bodies from taking cognizance of these disputes. It is to accommodate the state policy regarding alternative means of settling disputes such as arbitration in rendering speedy administration of justice. Whenever an award is granted, the same will be subject to court's intervention for recognition with due respect to the public policy concerns. In so doing, arbitration is being promoted without sacrificing the competition law policy of the Philippines.
机译：菲律宾反竞争纠纷的可仲裁性仍有待测试。正是菲律宾竞争法相对竞争，案件尚未在法庭面前带来。考虑到竞争争端是充满公共政策问题的大自然，这一领域需要很大的复杂性，仲裁的强制性例外。本文旨在审查菲律宾国内仲裁制度下的竞争纠纷的可仲裁性。该文件审查了菲律宾和国外案件和文学的审查后，菲律宾可能会认为，尽管存在各种公共政策问题，但菲律宾可以考虑美国和法国的职位，尽管存在各种公共政策问题。只有在司法机构在承认和执法之前提交仲裁裁决时，才应考虑公共政策问题，不应禁止国内仲裁机构认识到这些纠纷。它是为了适应关于解决争议等仲裁等争议的替代手段的国家政策，以迅速管理司法。每当授予奖励时，相同的情况将根据法院的干预，以适当尊重公共政策问题。这样做，正在促进仲裁，而不牺牲菲律宾的竞争法政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号