...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Crisis Response and Supervision System for Food Security: A Comparative Analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan
【24h】

Crisis Response and Supervision System for Food Security: A Comparative Analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan

机译:粮食安全危机应对与监督制度:中国大陆与台湾的比较分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In Mainland China, major food security incidents have occurred with high frequency, of which the number and degree of harm are both increasing. At the same time, Taiwan’s food security crisis has also been spreading. For these reasons, this article makes a comparative analysis of food security issues between Mainland China and Taiwan from a legal point of view and identifies the blind spots of the legal system and supervision using official documents and research papers regarding the most typical incidents in the period of 2008–2019. The results indicate that, compared with Mainland China, Taiwan has a better food security supervision system, and its experience with the supervision system, specific rules, social supervision, and responsibility is worth investigating. However, while there are loopholes in criminal law in Mainland China, which has not formed a complete system, criminal law in Taiwan is also weak in terms of regulation of food security incidents. Based on the results, this article puts forward suggestions with the expectation that, in the face of an increasingly severe food security crisis, Mainland China and Taiwan will strengthen their cooperation in constructing legal systems for food security supervision and inspection, exchange experience, cooperate in inspection, and share food security information to avoid rumors of food insecurity circulating in popular science. It is expected that the results and suggestions of this study will be helpful in the crisis response, as well as in the supervision systems in Mainland China and Taiwan for guarding food security. Although the comparative analysis is specific to the two regions, its characteristics are typical of food security globally, especially in Asia.
机译:在中国大陆,主要粮食安全事件发生高频率,其中伤害的数量和程度均增加。与此同时,台湾的粮食安全危机也一直在蔓延。由于这些原因,本文从法律角度来看,对中国大陆和台湾粮食安全问题进行了比较分析,并确定了在该期间最典型的典型事件的官方文件和研究论文的法律制度和监督的盲点2008-2019。结果表明,与中国大陆相比,台湾有更好的粮食安全监督系统,及其对监管制度,具体规则,社会监督和责任的经验值得调查。然而,虽然中国大陆刑事漏洞,但在中国大陆刑事法院,尚未形成完整的制度,在粮食安全事件的监管方面也缺乏刑法。基于结果,本文提出了期望的建议,面对日益严重的粮食安全危机,中国大陆和台湾将加强合作,建设粮食安全监督检验,交流经验,合作检查,并分享粮食安全信息,以避免在流行科学中传播的粮食不安全传闻。预计这项研究的结果和建议将有助于危机反应,以及守卫粮食安全的中国大陆和台湾的监督系统。虽然比较分析特定于两个地区,但其特征是全球粮食安全的典型,特别是在亚洲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号