...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality
【24h】

From the sticky floor to the glass ceiling and everything in between: protocol for a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical academic careers and interventions to address these, with a focus on gender inequality

机译：从粘滞地板到玻璃天花板和之间的一切：议定书，用于对临床学术职业和干预措施进行系统审查，以解决这些问题，重点是性别不平等

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Gender inequality within academic medicine and dentistry is a well-recognised issue, but one which is not completely understood in terms of its causes, or interventions to facilitate equality. This systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and synthesise the literature on facilitators and barriers to progression through a clinical academic career across medicine and dentistry. It will also explore interventions developed to increase recruitment and retention to clinical academic careers, with a particular focus on gender inequality. The search will cover five databases (MEDLINE (including MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and MEDLINE Daily), Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, and Education Resource Information Center (ERIC)), reference lists, and forward citation searching. We will include studies of doctors, dentists, and/or those with a supervisory role over their careers, with or without an academic career. Outcomes will be study defined, but relate to success rates of joining or continuing within a clinical academic career, including but not limited to success in gaining funding support, proportion of time spent in academic work, and numbers of awards/higher education qualifications, as well as experiences of professionals within the clinical academic pathway. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised controlled trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa tool for non-randomised studies, and the QARI tool for qualitative studies. Detailed plans for screening, data extraction, and analysis are provided within this protocol. This systematic review is situated within a larger project evaluating gender inequalities in clinical academic careers. This review will identify and synthetize barriers, facilitators, and interventions addressing gender inequalities in clinical academia. Our findings will increase awareness of inequalities in clinical academic careers through informing clinical academics, regulators and funders of the issues involved, and potential interventions to counteract these. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
机译：学术医学和牙科内的性别不平等是一个公认的问题，但在其原因或干预方面没有完全理解的问题，或干预措施。该系统审查旨在通过医学和牙科临床学术职业识别，批判性，并综合促进者和障碍的文献，并通过临床学术职业生涯。它还将探讨制定的干预措施，以增加招聘和保留临床学术职业，特别关注性别不平等。搜索将涵盖五个数据库（Medline（包括Medline Epub），包括在印刷，Medline In-Prodics和其他未索引引文，以及Medline Daily），Cochrane控制的试验登记（中央），Psycinfo和教育资源信息中心（Eric ）），参考列表和前进引用搜索。我们将包括医生，牙医和/或那些对其职业生涯的监督角色的研究，有或没有学术职业。结果将被定义，但涉及在临床学术职业中加入或继续的成功率，包括但不限于获得资金支持的成功，学术工作中花费的时间比例，以及奖励/高等教育资格的数量以及临床学术途径中专业人士的经验。研究质量将使用偏差工具的Cochrane风险评估随机对照试验，用于非随机研究的纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华工具，以及用于定性研究的Qari工具。在本协议中提供了筛选，数据提取和分析的详细计划。该系统审查位于较大的项目范围内，评估临床学术职业生涯中的性别不平等。该审查将识别和综合障碍，促进者和涉及临床学术界性别不平等的干预措施。我们的调查结果将通过通知所涉及的问题的临床学术，监管机构和资助者以及抵消这些问题的临床学术，监管机构和资助者提高临床学术职业中不等式的认识。结果将在同行评审日期刊上发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号