首页> 外文期刊>Pulmonary therapy. >Goldilocks, the Three Bears and Intensive Care Unit Utilization: Delivering Enough Intensive Care But Not Too Much. A Narrative Review
【24h】

Goldilocks, the Three Bears and Intensive Care Unit Utilization: Delivering Enough Intensive Care But Not Too Much. A Narrative Review

机译:金发姑娘,三只熊和重症监护室利用率:提供足够的重症监护,但不太可能。叙述评论

获取原文
       

摘要

Professional societies have developed recommendations for patient triage protocols, but wide variations in triage patterns for many acute conditions exist among hospitals in the United States. Differences in hospitals’ triage patterns can be attributed to factors such as physician behavior, hospital policy and real-time conditions such as intensive care unit capacity. The patient safety concern is that patients evaluated for admission to the intensive care unit during times of high intensive care unit capacity may have adverse outcomes related to delays in care. Because standardization of a national triage policy is not feasible due to differing resources available at each hospital, local guidelines should prevail that take into account hospitals’ local resources. The goal would be to better match intensive care unit bed supply with demand.
机译:专业社会已制定对患者分类方案的建议,但在美国的医院存在许多急性条件的各种急性条件的各种各样的差异。医院的分流模式的差异可归因于医生行为,医院政策和实时条件等因素,如重症监护单位容量。患者的安全问题是在高密集护理单位容量期间评价为重症监护手机的患者可能具有与护理延迟相关的不利结果。由于国家分类政策的标准化由于每家医院的不同资源而不可行,因此应以考虑医院的当地资源为准当地指南。目标是通过需求更好地匹配重症监护室床供应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号