...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>UIR Law Review >Eksaminasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tentang Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sepanjang Tahun 2018
【24h】

Eksaminasi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tentang Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sepanjang Tahun 2018

机译：在2018年腐败的腐败案例中审查地区法院关于刑事制裁的决定

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The results of criminal case decisions greatly affect the eradication of the relevant criminal offenses. So it is necessary to examine these decisions to see whether or not such judges' decisions can eradicate corruption or not. Moreover, it is understood that one of the purposes of criminal giving is a deterrent effect for both the perpetrators and others. Therefore the focus of this study: first, What is the form of criminal sanctions imposed by the Judge of the Pekanbaru District Court on Corruption Cases during 2018; second, how the imposition of criminal sanctions by the Pekanbaru District Court Judge in the Corruption Case in 2018 is related to the eradication of corruption. This type of research is a normative legal research that is based on mere secondary data and supplemented with interviews with certain parties. The research results obtained are the form of criminal sanctions given by judges in cases of corruption in the Pekanbaru District Court is only in the range of one to four years, twenty cases and for five years to ten years there are three remaining cases are cases that the prosecution does not can be accepted and the defendant is released from punishment. The sentence given by the judge on corruption cases in the Pekanbaru district court is still far from being said to have an impact on the eradication of corruption itself. Because, from the form of the sentence alone there are still many light and only given a special minimum sentence. Even though the losses suffered by the State are quite large. Then, many cases are subject to Article 3 of Article 2, where the sentence is lighter than Article 2
机译：刑事案件决策的结果极大地影响了根除相关刑事犯罪。因此，有必要检查这些决定，看看是否可以消除这些决定是否可以消除腐败。此外，据了解，刑事诉讼之一是对肇事者和其他人的威慑作用。因此，这项研究的重点：首先，佩凯加鲁地区法院法官刑事制裁是2018年腐败案件的刑事制裁的形式;其次，如何在2018年腐败案例中佩肯巴鲁地区法院判断刑事制裁有关腐败的根除。这种类型的研究是一种规范性法律研究，基于仅仅是次要数据，并补充了某些方面的访谈。获得的研究结果是法官在北南巴鲁地区法院腐败的刑事制裁形式，只有一到四年，二十例和五年到十年有三个剩余案件是案件起诉不能被接受，被告被释放免受惩罚。法官对北南巴鲁地区法院腐败案件给出的判决仍然据说对消除腐败本身产生影响。因为，从单独的句子的形式中仍然存在许多光，只给出特殊的最小句子。尽管国家遭受的损失也很大。然后，许多情况受第2条第3条的限制，其中句子比第2条更轻

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号