...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary and Animal Science >Comparison between rectal and body surface temperature in dogs by the calibrated infrared thermometer
【24h】

Comparison between rectal and body surface temperature in dogs by the calibrated infrared thermometer

机译:校准红外温度计狗直肠和体表温度的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Because dogs tolerate conventional rectal temperature measurements poorly, a calibrated infrared thermometer was tested for assessing canine body surface temperature. Body surface temperature of 204 dogs was estimated on various sites (digit, snout, axilla, eye, gum, inguinal region, and anal verge). Having rectal temperature as the gold standard, temperature difference, Spearman's correlation coefficient, hyperthermia and hypothermia detection sensitivity and specificity, and stress response score was calculated for each measurement site. Although the canine body surface temperature was considerably lower than the rectal temperature, there was a moderate correlation between both temperatures. Spearman's coefficients were 0.60 ( p 0.001) for the inguinal region with a single operator and 0.50 ( p 0.001) for the gum with multiple operators. Measurement site on the gum additionally guaranteed hyperthermia detection sensitivity and specificity up to 90.0% (95% CI: [66.7 100]) and 78.6% (95% CI: [71.6 85.2]), respectively. Measurements with the infrared thermometer provoked a statistically significant lower stress response (mean stress scores between 1.89 and 2.48/5) compared to the contact rectal measurements (stress score of 3.06/5). To conclude, the correct body surface temperature measurement should include a calibrated thermometer, reliable sampling, and the control of external factors such as ambient temperature influence. The transformation of body surface temperature to the recognized rectal temperature interval allows more straightforward data interpretation. The gum temperature exhibited the best clinical potential since the differences to rectal temperatures were below 1°C, and hyperthermia was detected with the sensitivity of up to 90%.
机译:因为狗耐受常规的直肠温度测量值差,所以测试校准的红外温度计以评估犬体表表面温度。在各种部位(数字,鼻子,腋窝,眼睛,牙龈,腹股沟区域和肛门边缘)上估计了204只狗的身体表面温度。为每种测量部位计算具有直肠温度,温度,温度差,矛盾的相关系数,高温和低温检测灵敏度和特异性,以及应力响应得分。虽然犬体表表面温度远低于直肠温度,但两个温度之间存在中等的相关性。对于具有多个操作员的牙龈的锻造地区,Spearman的系数为0.60(p <0.001),对于单个操作员,0.50(p <0.001),具有多个操作员。 GUM上的测量部位还保证了高温检测敏感性和特异性高达90.0%(95%CI:[66.7 100])和78.6%(95%CI:[71.6 85.2])。与接触直肠测量相比,红外温度计的测量激发了统计学上显着的降低应力响应(12.9和2.48 / 5之间的平均应力分数)(应力得分为3.06 / 5)。为了得出结论,正确的体表温度测量应包括校准的温度计,可靠的采样和对环境温度影响等外部因素的控制。身体表面温度的变化到识别的直肠温度间隔允许更直接的数据解释。胶温度表现出最佳的临床潜力,因为与直肠温度低于1℃的差异,并检测到高达90%的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号