• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Exploring Predictors of Moral Disengagement in Collegiate Athletic Trainers
【24h】

Exploring Predictors of Moral Disengagement in Collegiate Athletic Trainers

机译：探索大学运动培训师道德脱离的预测因素

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Context Considering recent high-profile reports of malpractice and negligence by National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletic trainers (ATs), it is prudent to investigate the psychological mechanisms that may influence ATs' ability to justify unethical behaviors. When treating injured student-athletes, ATs may undergo a cognitive process known as moral disengagement, which involves convincing oneself that ethical standards do not apply in a particular context. Objective To explore the psychological factors and traits among ATs that may predict moral disengagement pertaining to allowing athletes to play through injuries. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Online survey. Patients or Other Participants A total of 187 Division I, II, and III ATs from 100 NCAA universities. Main Outcome Measure(s) In addition to the primary outcome variable of moral disengagement, the survey captured the AT's demographic background, sport and athletic training histories, and measures of sport ethic, contesting orientations, commitment, and social identity. Results Cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous subgroups of participants based on these variables. A 2-cluster solution emerged, with cluster 1 (n = 94) scoring higher in the sport-ethic and sport-contesting orientations but lower in commitment and social identity compared with cluster 2 (n = 93). An independent-samples t test revealed that moral disengagement was highest (t185 = 19.59, P .001, d = 0.69) among ATs in cluster 1. Conclusions These findings advance our understanding of the psychological processes that may predict moral disengagement of ATs in allowing student-athletes to play through injury. Although additional research is needed to test whether moral disengagement influences return-to-play decisions, we provide initial evidence that ATs who conform to sport norms (eg, “no pain, no gain”) and who tend to view sport competition with a “war-like” orientation are more likely to morally disengage.
机译：背景论考虑到国家大学运动会（NCAA）运动培训师（ATS）的最近近期的医疗事故和疏忽的报告，谨慎调查可能影响不道德行为的能力的心理机制。在治疗受伤的学生运动员时，ATS可能会接受称为道德脱离的认知过程，这涉及说服自己，道德标准不适用于特定的背景。目的探讨ats中的心理因素和特征，可能预测与允许运动员通过伤害进行的道德脱离。设计横断面研究。设置在线调查。患者或其他参与者共187师I，II和III ATS，来自100名NCAA大学。主要成果措施除了道德脱离的主要结果变量外，该调查占据了AT的人口背景，体育和运动培训历史，以及体育伦理，竞争，承诺和社会形式的措施。结果群集分析用于识别参与者的同质子组，基于这些变量。出现了一个2级群集解决方案，在运动 - 伦理和运动竞争方向上进行群集1（n = 94），但与群集2（n = 93）相比，承诺和社会识别较低。独立样品T测试显示，道德脱离最高（T185 = 19.59，P <.001，D = 0.69），间在集群中的ATS中。结论这些发现推进了我们对可能预测交叉道德脱离的心理过程的理解让学生运动员通过受伤。虽然需要额外的研究来测试道德脱离是否会影响回归的决定，但我们提供符合体育规范的初步证据（例如，“没有痛苦，没有收益”），往往将体育竞争与“战争之类的“方向更有可能在道德上脱离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号