• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Response to Letter by Seibold regarding “Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes”
【24h】

Response to Letter by Seibold regarding “Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes”

机译：对Seibold的信函关于“血糖可变性和连续葡萄糖监测的血糖变异和低血糖监测相比，在具有最高风险1型糖尿病的成年人中间歇扫描的连续葡萄糖监测”

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We thank Seibold for again pointing out their concerns regard- ing the I HART CGM study. 1 We have addressed this issue in the original paper 2 and have responded in detail previously. 3 In brief, this can be looked at in two ways. If the outcomes from the two monitoring technologies are not comparable, this sug- gests differing accuracy. Data suggest superior accuracy with Dexcom G5 than with FreeStyleLibre, especially in the critical hypoglycemic range, 4 which, along with the results of the I HART continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and HypoDE studies, suggest that the findings that CGM is the monitoring methodology of choice in people at high risk of hypoglycemia are robust. This view is reflected in national guidance.
机译：我们感谢Seibold再次指出他们对I Hart CGM学习的担忧。 1我们在原文2中解决了这个问题，并先前详细答复过。 3简而言之，这可以用两种方式看。如果两个监测技术的结果不可比较，则这种速度的精度不同。数据表明，与Freestylelibre的Dexcom G5卓越，特别是在临界低血糖范围内，其中4个，以及I HART连续葡萄糖监测（CGM）和Hypode研究的结果，表明CGM是监测方法的结果低血糖高风险的人的选择是强大的。这种观点反映在国家指导中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号