• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Data and Information Science >Discipline Impact Factor: Some of Its History, Some of the Author's Experience of Its Application, the Continuing Reasons for Its Use and… Next Beyond
【24h】

Discipline Impact Factor: Some of Its History, Some of the Author's Experience of Its Application, the Continuing Reasons for Its Use and… Next Beyond

机译：纪律影响因素：其中一些历史，一些作者的应用程序的经验，其使用的持续原因和......接下来

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose This work aims to consider the role and some of the 42-year history of the discipline impact factor (DIF) in evaluation of serial publications. Also, the original “symmetric” indicator called the “discipline susceptibility factor” is to be presented. Design/methodology/approach In accordance with the purpose of the work, the methods are analytical interpretation of the scientific literature related to this problem as well as speculative explanations. The information base of the research is bibliometric publications dealing with impact, impact factor, discipline impact factor, and discipline susceptibility factor. Findings Examples of the DIF application and modification of the indicator are given. It is shown why research and university libraries need to use the DIF to evaluate serials in conditions of scarce funding for subscription to serial publications, even if open access is available. The role of the DIF for evaluating journals by authors of scientific papers when choosing a good and right journal for submitting a paper is also briefly discussed. An original indicator “symmetrical” to the DIF (the “discipline susceptibility factor”) and its differences from the DIF in terms of content and purpose of evaluation are also briefly presented. Research limitations The selection of publications for the information base of the research did not include those in which the DIF was only mentioned, used partially or not for its original purpose. Restrictions on the length of the article to be submitted in this special issue of the JDIS also caused exclusion even a number of completely relevant publications. Consideration of the DIF is not placed in the context of describing other derivatives from the Garfield impact factor. Practical implications An underrated bibliometric indicator, viz. the discipline impact factor is being promoted for the practical application. An original indicator “symmetrical” to DIF has been proposed in order of searching serial publications representing the external research fields that might fit for potential applications of the results of scientific activities obtained within the framework of the specific research field represented by the cited specialized journals. Both can be useful in research and university libraries in their endeavors to improve scientific information services. Also, both can be used for evaluating journals by authors of scientific papers when choosing a journal to submit a paper. Originality/value The article substantiates the need to evaluate scientific serial publications in library activities—even in conditions of access to huge and convenient databases (subscription packages) and open access to a large number of serial publications. It gives a mini-survey of the history of one of the methods of such evaluation, and offers an original method for evaluating scientific serial publications.
机译：目的，这项工作旨在考虑序列出版物评估中学科影响因子（DIF）的角色和一些42年历史。此外，应呈现称为“纪律敏感因子”的原始“对称”指示器。设计/方法/方法按照作品的目的，方法是对该问题相关的科学文学的分析解释以及投机性解释。该研究的信息基础是处理影响，影响因素，纪律影响因素和纪律易感因素的生物计量出版物。给出了指示器的DIF应用和修改的结果。结果显示为什么研究和大学图书馆需要在稀缺资金条件下使用DIF来评估序列资金的序列，即使可用开放访问。还简要讨论了在选择良好和正确的撰写提交纸质时评估科学论文的作者评估期刊的作用。还简要介绍了对DIF（“纪律敏感因子”）的原始指示器“对称”（“纪律敏感因子”）及其与差异的差异以及评估的目的。研究局限性研究的信息基础的出版物的选择不包括仅在其原始目的中使用DIF的那些。在JDIS的本特刊上提交的文章长度的限制也甚至甚至甚至是一些完全相关的出版物的排斥。对DIF的考虑不是放置在从GARFIELD影响因子的其他衍生品的上下文中。实际影响被低估的生物尺度指标，viz。实际应用促进了纪律的影响因素。已经提出了一个原始指标“对称”的“对称”，以便搜索代表外部研究领域的序列出版物，该领域可能适合于在被引用的专业期刊代表的特定研究领域的框架内获得的科学活动的潜在应用。两者都可以在研究和大学图书馆中有用，努力改善科学信息服务。此外，两者都可以用于评估科学论文的作者在选择期刊上提交文件时评估期刊。原创性/价值本文证实需要在图书馆活动中评估科学串行出版物 - 即使在访问庞大和方便的数据库（订阅包）和对大量串行出版物的访问条件下。它给出了这种评估方法之一的历史的迷你调查，并提供了一种评估科学串行出版物的原始方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号