• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European CME >Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection Standardising Outcomes Assessment: Demonstrating the Power of Comparative Outcomes Data
【24h】

Outcomes in CME/CPD - Special Collection Standardising Outcomes Assessment: Demonstrating the Power of Comparative Outcomes Data

机译：CME / CPD的结果 - 特殊收集标准化结果评估：展示比较结果数据的力量

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One challenge in medical education is the inability to compare and aggregate outcomes data across continuing educational activities due to variations in evaluation tools, data collection approaches and reporting. To address this challenge, Gilead collaborated with CE Outcomes to develop, pilot, and implement a standardized outcomes evaluation across Gilead directed medical education activities around the world. Development of the standardized tool occurred during late 2018, with Gilead stakeholders invited to provide input on the questions and structure of the evaluation form. Once input was captured, a draft evaluation tool was developed and circulated for feedback. Questions were created to collect 1) participant demographic characteristics 2)data on planned changes to practice, key learnings and anticipated barriers, and 3) learner satisfaction with content and perceived achievement of learning objectives. The evaluation tool was piloted in H1 2019 across 7 medical education activities. Revisions based on pilot feedback were incorporated. The evaluation tool was broadly released during H2 2019 and data were collected from over 30 educational activities. By the end of 2019, it was possible to compare outcomes results from individual activities and aggregate data to demonstrate overall educational reach and impact. Continuing education activities provide valuable up-to-date information to clinicians with the goal of improving patient care. While often challenging to highlight the impact of education due to variations in outcomes, this standardized approach establishes a method to collect meaningful outcomes data that demonstrates the collective impact of continuing education and allows for comparison across individual activities.
机译：由于评估工具，数据收集方法和报告的变化，医学教育中的一个挑战是无法比较和聚集在继续教育活动中的结果数据。为了解决这一挑战，Gilead与CE结果合作开发，飞行员，并在世界各地的吉尔德指示的医学教育活动中实施标准化结果评估。 2018年底发生了标准化工具的发展，邀请Gilead利益攸关方提供评估表的问题和结构的投入。一旦捕获输入，就开发了一个评估工具草案并分发了反馈。提出的问题是收集1）参与人口统计特征2）关于计划变更的数据，以实践，关键学习和预期障碍，以及3）学习者满意度与内容和学习目标的认识到实现。评估工具在2019年在2019年的7日医学教育活动中驾驶。纳入了基于导频反馈的修订。评估工具在2019年H2期间大致释放，并从30多个教育活动中收集数据。截至2019年底，有可能与各个活动的结果进行比较结果，并汇总数据，以展示整体教育范围和影响。继续教育活动为临床医生提供有价值的最新信息，目标是改善患者护理。虽然策划由于结果的变化而突出教育的影响，但这种标准化方法建立了一种收集有意义的结果数据的方法，该方法展示了持续教育的集体影响，并允许在各个活动中比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号