...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Young Pharmacists >E-Cigarettes: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2001-18
【24h】

E-Cigarettes: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2001-18

机译:电子香烟:2001-18期间全球出版物的科学计量评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The paper makes assessment of global e-cigarette publications (3885 publications) trends over the past 18 years (2001-8) via a bibliometric analysis, using Scopus database. The paper further provides an insight into qualitative performance of e-cigarettes research in terms of qualitative indicators, such as relative citation index, citations per paper, highly cited papers, top 15 global organizations and authors in the field, most favored subjects in the field. E-cigarettes annual and nine-year cumulative global publication output registered 113.60% and 7570.0% growth during the last 18 years and its citation impact averaged to 18.71 citations per paper. 89.63% share of the global research output and more than 100% share of global citation output in the field emanates from top 10 (among 37 participating countries) during 2001-18. Seven (out of top 10) countries registered relative citation index above their global average of 1.29: Canada and Italy (2.32 each), Greece (1.75), Australia (1.54), U.K. and Switzerland (1.42 each) and France (1.30) during 2001-18. Medicine is the most preferred subject on e-cigarettes research with 81.75% global publications share, followed distantly by pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics (13.15%), social sciences (9.146%), environment science (7.26%), etc. during this period. Among 525 organizations and 729 authors participating in e-cigarettes research, the top 15 organizations and the authors collectively contributed 26.64% and 13.64% global publication share and 47.78% and 33.25% global citation share, respectively during 2001-18. USA and U.K. were the leading global organizations with global publications share of 52.15% and 12.54%. University of California, San Francisco, USA and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hills, USA were the leading organizations with 135 and 87 papers. Roswell Park Cancer Institute, USA (53.79 and 2.88) and Food and Drug Administration, MD, USA (42.33 and 2.26) were the two leading organizations in terms of citation impact per paper and relative citation index. R. Polosa (61 papers) and K.E. Farsalinos (45 papers) were the two most productive authors on the subject. M.L. Goniewicz (77.02 and 4.12) and S.A. Glantz (69.50 and 3.71) were the two leading authors in terms of citation impact per paper and relative citation index. Nicotine and Tobacco Research (184 papers) and Tobacco Control (168 papers) were the leading journals (among 305 participating journals) publishing on this theme. 141 papers (among 3885 total papers) registered 100 to 2902 citations per paper, cumulating to a total 31459 citations, averaging to 223.11 citations per paper.
机译:本文通过使用SCOPUS数据库,对过去18岁(2001-8)的全球电子烟出版物(3885出版物)趋势进行了评估。本文进一步介绍了在定性指标方面对电子卷烟研究的定性表现,如相对引用指数,每篇论文的引用,高度引用的论文,前15名全球组织和该领域的作者,最有利于该领域的主题。电子烟头年度和九年累计全球出版物产量在过去18年期间注册了113.60%和7570.0%,其引用影响平均为每份纸张18.71引用。 89.63%的全球研究产出份额和超过100%的全球引用产出份额在2001-18期间从前10名(在37个参加国家)中出版物。七(十大五分之一)国家注册的相对引文指数以上其全球平均平均值为1.29:加拿大和意大利(每人2.32),希腊(1.75),澳大利亚(1.54),英国和瑞士(每人1.42)和法国(1.30) 2001-18。医学是全球出版物81.75%的全球出版物研究的最优选的主题,随之而来的是药理学,毒理学和药物(13.15%),社会科学(9.146%),环境科学(7.26%)等。 。在525个组织和729个作者中,参加了E-un卷烟研究,前15名组织和作者分别在2001-18期间共同贡献了26.64%和13.64%的全球出版物份额和47.78%和33.25%。美国和U.K.是全球领先的组织,全球出版物占52.15%和12.54%。加州大学,美国旧金山,美国和北卡罗来纳大学的美国教堂山,是有135和87篇论文的领先组织。 Roswell Park Cancer Institute,美国(53.79和2.88)和食品和药物管理局,MD,美国(42.33和2.26)是每篇论文和相对引用指数的引文影响的两家领先组织。 R. Polosa(61篇论文)和K.E. Farsalinos(45篇论文)是该主题上的两个最富有成效的作者。 M.L. Goniewicz(77.02和4.12)和S.A. Glantz(69.50和3.71)是两家纸张和相对引文指数的引用影响方面的两位领先作者。尼古丁和烟草研究(184篇论文)和烟草控制(168篇论文)是在这一主题上发表的主要期刊(305个参加期刊)。 141篇论文(3885篇总文中)每篇论文注册了100至2902个引文,累计为31459名引文,平均每张纸为223.11引用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号