...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Clinical Manifestation and Diagnostic Approach Towards ‘TORCH Test’: A Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Study
【24h】

Clinical Manifestation and Diagnostic Approach Towards ‘TORCH Test’: A Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Study

机译：“火炬测试”的临床表现与诊断方法：知识，态度和实践研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

'TORCH Test' (Toxoplasmosis, Rubella Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex) is usually requisitioned in females having a??Bad Obstetrics History (BOH)a?? or those who are suspicious of a??intrauterine infectiona?? or for neonates having congenital malformation. However, the understanding of the test is lacking amongst the practitioners. Hence, this Knowledge Attitude and Practice (KAP) study was conducted to access the knowledge of resident doctors about the correct way of requesting TORCH test.Aim: To assess the understanding, clinical manifestation and diagnostic approach towards TORCH test amongst the Resident Doctors.Materials and Methods: Four groups of questions were put to Resident Doctors from Obstetrics and Gynecology (ObG), Paediatrics (Paeds) and Microbiology Department to assess their understanding of TORCH test. The questionnaire having 30 questions was divided in four groups A, B, C and D. Group A (Q. 1-4) about the fundamental of TORCH infection; Group B (Q. 5-8) brief clinical manifestation; Group C (Q. 9-12) indication of TORCH test i.e., when torch test should be requested and Group D (Q. 13-30) result interpretation of TORCH profile.Results: Questions as to the full form of TORCH test were correctly answered by almost all participants. As far as questions as to Clinical Manifestation, residents of ObG (72.3%) were more accurate in predicting than that of Paeds residents (48%). Amongst Microbiology residents only 5.2% of them were able to gave correct answers. When questions as to when the TORCH test is to be recommended were asked, only 30.7% residents of Paeds, 59% of ObG and 10.5% of Microbiology were aware about it. Interpretation of the test results amongst the participants was also not that up to the mark as only 36.1% in Paeds, 67.6% in ObG and 29.8% in Microbiology residents were correctly able to predict. To sum up, understanding, clinical manifestation and diagnostic approach towards TORCH test is better amongst the ObG residents (67.7%) as compared to that of the Microbiology Residents (26.7%) and Paeds Residents (42%).Conclusion: It can be understood that since the clinical branch residents of ObG and Paeds are not that thoroughly acquainted with the TORCH test understanding and complete clinical information is necessary. Therefore, it is apparent that the same is being not requisitioned in cases where pregnant women or infants have non-descript illnesses where testing is not necessary at all. It is, therefore, highly recommended that regular seminars and teaching activities are conducted by the concerned respective departments in order to impart TORCH test understanding and complete clinical information regarding it.
机译：'火炬测试'（弓形虫病，风疹塞细胞病毒，疱疹单纯疱疹）通常征用在妇女的伤害历史（BOH）a ??或者那些怀疑的人宫内节育会感染？或者具有先天性畸形的新生儿。然而，在从业者中缺乏对测试的理解。因此，这种知识态度和实践（KAP）研究是为了获取驻地医生的知识，了解了割炬测试的正确方式。目的：评估居民中武器测试的理解，临床表现和诊断方法医生。材料和方法：从妇产科（OBG），儿科（Paeds）和微生物学部门的居民医生，四组问题，以评估他们对火炬测试的理解。有30个问题的调查问卷分为四组A，B，C和D. A（Q.1-4）关于火炬感染的基础; B组（Q. 5-8）简短的临床表现; C组（Q. 9-12）割炬测试的指示，即应要求割炬测试和组D（Q.13-30）结果解释炮眼。结果：到了全文的疑问几乎所有参与者都正确回答了测试。至于临床表现的问题，OBG的居民（72.3％）在预测比Paeds居民（48％）更准确。在微生物学居民中只有5.2％的人能够得到正确的答案。当提出要建议的武器测试时，有关武器测试时，只有30.7％的Paeds居民，59％的obg和10.5％的微生物学都知道。对参与者的测试结果的解释也不是，在Paeds中只有36.1％，OBG中只有67.6％，微生物学居民的29.8％是正确的能够预测。总结，理解，临床表现和对火炬测试的诊断方法与微生物学居民（26.7％）和Paeds居民（42％）相比，在OBG居民（67.7％）中更好。结论：它可以理解，由于OBG和Paeds的临床分支居民并不是彻底熟悉武器测试理解和完整的临床信息。因此，显而易见的是，在孕妇或婴儿具有非描述性疾病的情况下，并未征用同样的征用，其中无需测试。因此，强烈建议有关各部门进行定期研讨会和教学活动，以便赋予火炬测试理解和完整的临床信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号