首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology
【24h】

Missing lateral relationships in top-level concepts of an ontology

机译:在本体的顶级概念中缺少横向关系

获取原文
           

摘要

Ontologies house various kinds of domain knowledge in formal structures, primarily in the form of concepts and the associative relationships between them. Ontologies have become integral components of many health information processing environments. Hence, quality assurance of the conceptual content of any ontology is critical. Relationships are foundational to the definition of concepts. Missing relationship errors (i.e., unintended omissions of important definitional relationships) can have a deleterious effect on the quality of an ontology. An abstraction network is a structure that overlays an ontology and provides an alternate, summarization view of its contents. One kind of abstraction network is called an area taxonomy, and a variation of it is called a subtaxonomy. A methodology based on these taxonomies for more readily finding missing relationship errors is explored. The area taxonomy and the subtaxonomy are deployed to help reveal concepts that have a high likelihood of exhibiting missing relationship errors. A specific top-level grouping unit found within the area taxonomy and subtaxonomy, when deemed to be anomalous, is used as an indicator that missing relationship errors are likely to be found among certain concepts. Two hypotheses pertaining to the effectiveness of our Quality Assurance approach are studied. Our Quality Assurance methodology was applied to the Biological Process hierarchy of the National Cancer Institute thesaurus (NCIt) and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy within its Clinical finding hierarchy. Many missing relationship errors were discovered and confirmed in our analysis. For both test-bed hierarchies, our Quality Assurance methodology yielded a statistically significantly higher number of concepts with missing relationship errors in comparison to a control sample of concepts. Two hypotheses are confirmed by these findings. Quality assurance is a critical part of an ontology’s lifecycle, and automated or semi-automated tools for supporting this process are invaluable. We introduced a Quality Assurance methodology targeted at missing relationship errors. Its successful application to the NCIt’s Biological Process hierarchy and SNOMED CT’s Eye/vision finding subhierarchy indicates that it can be a useful addition to the arsenal of tools available to ontology maintenance personnel.
机译:本体在正式结构中占各种领域知识,主要是以概念和它们之间的联想关系为主。本体成为许多健康信息处理环境的组成部分。因此,任何本体论的概念内容的质量保证至关重要。关系是关于概念的定义的基础。缺少的关系错误(即,重要的定义关系的非预期遗漏)可以对本体质量有害影响。抽象网络是覆盖本体的结构,并提供其内容的替代摘要视图。一种抽象网络被称为区域分类,并且它的变化被称为亚统计学。探讨了基于这些分类法的方法,以便更容易发现缺失的关系错误。部署该地区分类和亚克纳米组织,以帮助揭示具有展出缺失关系错误的高可能性的概念。当被视为异常时,在区域分类和亚组织内发现的特定顶级分组单元被用作某些概念中可能会发现缺少关系错误的指标。研究了与我们的质量保证方法有效性相关的两个假设。我们的质量保证方法应用于国家癌症研究所(NCIT)的生物过程等级,并在其临床发现等级中的CT在CT的CT的眼睛/视野中发现了基础。在我们的分析中发现并确认了许多缺失的关系错误。对于两种测试床层次结构,我们的质量保证方法与概念的控制样本相比,我们的质量保证方法产生了具有缺失的关系错误的统计上显着更高的概念。这些发现证实了两个假设。质量保证是本体生命周期的关键部分,自动或半自动工具用于支持此过程是宝贵的。我们介绍了针对缺失关系错误的质量保证方法。它的成功应用于NCIT的生物过程层次结构和Snomed CT的Eye / Vision查找子系统表明它可以是对本体维护人员可用的工具库的有用补充。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号