首页> 外文期刊>Computational Chemistry >Theoretical Determination of Influence of the Metallic State of Oxidation toward Cytotoxic Activity: Case of Ruthenium Complexes
【24h】

Theoretical Determination of Influence of the Metallic State of Oxidation toward Cytotoxic Activity: Case of Ruthenium Complexes

机译:理论测定氧化氧化金属状态对细胞毒性的影响:钌配合物的情况

获取原文
           

摘要

Ruthenium complexes present two states of oxidation that are Ru(II) and Ru(III). Both are assumed to present cytotoxic activity at ground state. On the purpose of highlighting their differences, DFT, TD-DFT and NBO have been performed at both Wb97xd/Lanl2dz and B3lyp/Lanl2dz levels. NBO program shows that both groups of ruthenium complexes present almost the same charge of Ru atom. Moreover, they display nearly the same structure of valence orbitals of the ruthenium. However, when it comes to compare their frontier orbitals HOMO and LUMO, we notice that the chloride atom has a great influence on their energy. The lack of Chloride atoms reduces the energy of frontier orbitals regardless of the functional. And the more the number of chloride atoms, the higher the energy. Also, RuCl_(3)Terpy and α-RuCl_(2)(Azpy)_(2) have been discovered to display the best energy suitable for reaction as cytotoxic agents. Yet, both are from groups different. Thus, at ground state, there is practically no difference between both groups. However, regarding TDDFT prediction with the determination of vertical electronic affinity VEA and vertical ionization potential VIP both at ground state S and at exciting T1 state, we notice that Ru(II) complexes are not active either in the presence or absence of ~(3)O_(2) molecule. Here, only Ru(III) complexes are able to react on Guanine through their radical cations or by generating the superoxide radical anion . Therefore, the Ru(III) complexes are assumed to be active both at a fundamental state and under the effect of light for photodynamic therapy. We come to conclude that Ru(II) complexes are not active by excitation as their valence electrons are paired thereby making these complexes more stable. Besides, ?, a Ru(II) molecule that is not active at ground state owing certainly to its C_(3) symmetry or Azpy ligand presents all the same a difficult activity on generating . For the coming paper, we intend to check whether Ru(II) complex can be active under the effect of light if it is in a triplet charge state.
机译:钌配合物存在两种氧化状态,ru(ii)和ru(iii)。假设两者都在地面呈现细胞毒性活性。在WB97XD / LANL2DZ和B3LYP / LANL2DZ水平上进行了突出显示差异,DFT,TD-DFT和NBO的目的。 NBO程序表明,两组钌配合物存在几乎相同的Ru原子。此外,它们呈现钌的替补轨道结构几乎相同的结构。然而,当谈到他们的前沿轨道同性恋和卢比时,我们注意到氯化物原子对他们的能量有很大影响。无论功能性如何,氯化物原子缺乏减少了前轨道的能量。并且氯化物原子的数量越多,能量越高。此外,已经发现RuCl_(3)Terpy和α-RuCl_(2)(azpy)_(2)以显示适合作为细胞毒性剂的最佳能量。然而,两者都来自群体不同。因此,在地状态下,两组之间实际上没有区别。然而,关于在接地状态S和令人兴奋的T1状态下垂直电子亲和力VEA和垂直电离电位VIP确定TDDFT预测,我们注意到Ru(II)复合物在存在或不存在下不活跃〜(3 )O_(2)分子。这里,只有Ru(III)复合物能够通过它们的自由基阳离子或通过产生超氧化物自由基阴离子对鸟嘌呤反应。因此,假设Ru(III)复合物在基本状态下和光动力治疗的光的作用下活跃。我们得出结论,Ru(ii)复合物由于它们的价电子与由此使这些配合物更稳定而导致ru(ii)复合物不活跃。此外,尤其是在其C_(3)对称或AZPY配体的地面状态下未在地态处活跃的Ru(II)分子呈现出在产生的所有相同活动。对于即将到来的纸张,我们打算检查Ru(II)复合物是否可以在光线上处于三重态充电状态的效果下活跃。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号