首页> 外文期刊>Asthma research and practice. >Treatment of asthma in young children: evidence-based recommendations
【24h】

Treatment of asthma in young children: evidence-based recommendations

机译:幼儿治疗哮喘:基于证据的建议

获取原文
           

摘要

In the present review, we focus on evidence-based data for the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), long-acting beta2-agonits (LABA) and oral corticosteroids (OCS), with a special emphasis on well-performed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of such trials for the chronic management of asthma/wheeze in infants and preschoolers. Results: Seven meta-analyses and 14 RCTs were reviewed. Daily ICS should be the preferred drug for infants/preschoolers with recurrent wheezing, especially in asthmatics. For those with moderate or severe episodes of EVW, the use of high intermittent ICS doses significantly reduce the use of OCS. There is no evidence of effect of intermittent ICS at low-moderate dose in preschoolers with mild EVW episodes. In preschoolers with asthma, there were no significant differences between daily vs. intermittent ICS in terms of asthma exacerbations with insufficient power to conclude to equivalence; however, for other asthma control outcomes, daily ICS works significantly better than intermittent ICS for older children. Daily ICS is superior to daily or intermittent LRTA for reducing symptoms, preventing exacerbations, and improving lung function. No RCTs testing combination therapy with ICS and LABA (or LTRA) were published in infant/preschoolers. Parent-initiation of OCS at the first sign of symptoms is not effective in children with recurrent wheezing episode. In terms of ICS safety, growth suppression is dose and molecule-dependent but it’s effect is not cumulative beyond the first year of therapy and may be associated with some catch-up growth while on or off therapy. Linear growth must be monitored as individual susceptibility to ICS drugs may vary considerably.
机译:在本综述中,我们专注于使用吸入的皮质类固醇(ICS),白酮受体拮抗剂(LTRA),长效β2-毒剂(Laba)和口服皮质类固醇(OCS)的循证数据,并特别强调在婴儿和学龄前儿童哮喘患者的慢性管理慢性管理的这种试验进行随机随机临床试验(RCTS)和荟萃分析。结果:审查了七元分析和14个RCT。每日IC应该是婴儿/学龄前儿童的首选药物,特别是在哮喘中。对于eVW中等或严重情节的那些,使用高间歇性ICS剂量可显着减少OC的使用。没有轻度EVW发作的学龄前儿童中低中剂量的间歇性IC的效果没有证据。在具有哮喘的学龄前儿童中,在哮喘恶化方面与间歇性IC之间没有显着差异,不足以得出到等价的权力不足;然而,对于其他哮喘控制结果,每日ICS比年龄较大的儿童间歇性IC更好地工作。每日ICS优于日常或间歇性LRTA,用于减少症状,防止加剧,改善肺功能。在婴儿/学龄前,尚未用ICS和Laba(或LTRA)测试组合治疗的RCT。在症状的第一个迹象中对症状的父母起始在经常发生的喘息集的儿童中无效。就ICS安全而言,生长抑制是剂量和分子依赖性,但它的效果不是累积的,而不是疗法的第一年,并且在接受或关闭治疗时可能与一些追赶增长有关。线性生长必须被监测,因为对ICS药物的个体易感性可能会有所不同。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号