首页> 外文期刊>Asthma research and practice. >A qualitative evaluation of the implementation of guidelines and a support tool for asthma management in primary care
【24h】

A qualitative evaluation of the implementation of guidelines and a support tool for asthma management in primary care

机译:对初级保健中哮喘管理实施指南和支持工具的定性评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Asthma management in Australia is suboptimal. The “Guidelines for provision of a Pharmacist Only medicine: short acting beta agonists” (SABA guidelines) and a novel West Australian “Asthma Action Plan card” (AAP card) were concurrently developed to improve asthma management. The aim of this qualitative research was to evaluate the collaborative, multidisciplinary and multifaceted implementation of these asthma resources and identify the lessons learnt to inform future initiatives. Methods Feedback was sought about the implementation of the SABA guidelines and the AAP card using focus groups with key stakeholders including pharmacists (×2), pharmacy assistants, asthma educators, general practitioners, practice nurses and people with asthma (patients). Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed thematically using constant comparison. The common themes identified from the focus groups were categorised according to a taxonomy of barriers including barriers related to knowledge, attitudes and behaviour. Results Seven focus group sessions were held with 57 participants. Knowledge barriers were identified included a lack of awareness and lack of familiarity of the resources. There was a significant lack of awareness of the AAP card where passive implementation methods had been utilised. Pharmacists had good awareness of the SABA guidelines but pharmacy assistants were unaware of the guidelines despite significant involvement in the sale of SABAs. Environmental barriers included time and workflow issues and the role of the pharmacy assistant in the organisation workflows of the pharmacy. The attitudes and behaviours of health professionals and patients with asthma were discordant and this undermined optimal asthma management. Suggestions to improve asthma management included the use of legislation, the use of electronic resources integrated into workflows and training pharmacists or practice nurses to provide patients with written asthma action plans. Conclusions Greater consideration needs to be given to implementation of resources to improve awareness and overcome barriers to utilisation. Attitudes and behaviours of both health professionals and patients with asthma need to be addressed. Interventions directed toward health professionals should focus on skills needs related to achieving improved communication and patient behaviour change.
机译:背景哮喘管理在澳洲是次优的。在“为提供只有药师药指南:短效β受体激动剂”(SABA准则)和新的西澳大利亚人报“哮喘行动计划卡”(AAP卡)进行并行开发,提高哮喘管理。此定性研究的目的是评估协作,多学科和多层面的实施,这些哮喘资源并确定了经验教训,以便为将来的举措。方法反馈是寻求有关的SABA准则的执行和使用重点群体与关键利益相关者,包括药剂师(×2),药房助理,哮喘教育,全科医师,执业护士和哮喘病人(患者)的AAP卡。录音被转录逐字。数据使用不断比较主题进行分析。从焦点小组确定的共同主题是根据障碍,包括相关知识,态度和行为障碍分类法分类。结果七个专题小组会议举行了57人参加。知识的壁垒包括鉴定缺乏认识,缺乏对资源的熟悉。有一个显著缺乏地方已经利用被动实施方法AAP卡的意识。有药剂师的指导方针SABA意识好,但药房助理没有意识到的指引,尽管在售SABAS的显著参与。环境障碍包括时间和工作流程问题,并在药店的工作流程组织药房助手作用。态度和卫生专业人员的行为和哮喘患者不和谐,这削弱了最佳的哮喘管理。建议改善哮喘管理包括利用立法,融入工作流程和培训药师或执业护士使用电子资源,为患者提供书面哮喘行动计划。结论更多的考虑需要给予实施资源,提高认识和克服所面临的障碍。既卫生专业人员和哮喘患者需要的态度和行为加以解决。对卫生专业人员直接干预应侧重于有关实现改善沟通和患者行为改变技能的需求。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号