...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology >Quality of Communication Life in People with Aphasia: Implications for Intervention
【24h】

Quality of Communication Life in People with Aphasia: Implications for Intervention

机译:具有性腺的人们的沟通生活质量:干预的含义

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: The main goals were to determine the effectiveness of two commonly used communication-related Quality of Life (QoCL) measures, and the impact of aphasia-related factors on quality of life (QoL) and QoCL in persons with aphasia (PWAs). Method: Twenty-one PWAs ranging from 47 to 91 years of age with post-onset periods of 2 months to 14 years were tested using standardized and criterion-measure tools to assess their language and cognitive functions, QoL, and QoCL. Additionally, participants completed a demographics questionnaire, which also included information on their stroke and the kinds of therapies they had received. Assessments were conducted over two sessions with randomized order of test administrations to control fatigue and order effects. Results and Discussions: Correlation-matrix was used to determine the strength of relations between test measures. The impact of QoL related factors (viz., aphasia severity, cognitive functioning, time post-onset, and therapy received) on QoCL was examined using ANOVAs. The ASHA Quality of Communication Life Scale (ASHA-QCL) had more significant correlations with other QoL measures than the ASHA-Functional Assessment of Communication Skills (ASHA-FACS). Aphasia severity, cognitive deficits, and therapy received contributed significantly to QoL and QoCL in PWAs. Conclusions: Evaluating overall QoL may not fully reveal the QoCL in PWAs. Measuring QoCL specifically is crucial in aphasia interventions, and it is equally important to use sensitive tools that can capture the QoCL effectively. ASHA-QCL was more effective than ASHA-FACS in capturing the QoCL. QoCL must be considered even when working with PWAs with severe aphasias and/or mild cognitive deficits.
机译:背景和宗旨:主要目标是确定两个常用的通信相关生活质量(QOCL)措施的有效性,以及具有失语症的人的生活质量(QOL)和触发性的失语相关因素的影响(PWA )。方法:使用标准化和标准测量工具测试25岁以上的PWA,从47岁到91岁,2个月至14岁,以评估他们的语言和认知功能,QOL和QoCL。此外,参与者还完成了人口统计学调查问卷,其中还包括他们中风的信息和他们收到的各种疗法。评估在两个会议上进行两次,随机秩序进行试验管理,以控制疲劳和秩序效应。结果与讨论:相关矩阵用于确定测试措施之间关系的力量。使用ANOVA检查QOL相关因素(viz,viz,性症严重程度,认知功能,时间后发作后发作后发作和治疗)。 ASHA通信寿命规模(ASHA-QCL)与其他QOL措施的相关性更为显着,而不是对沟通技巧的ASHA功能评估(ASHA-FACS)。可能在PWA中的QOL和QOCL接收的失语症严重程度,认知赤字和治疗显着贡献。结论:评估整体QOL可能无法完全揭示PWA中的触发。测量QOCL特异性在厌食症干预中至关重要,并且使用可以有效捕获QoCL的敏感工具同样重要。 Asha-QCL比捕获触发器的ASHA-FACS更有效。即使使用具有严重失调和/或轻度认知赤字的PWA,也必须考虑QoCL。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号