...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of General Medicine >Evidence-Based Guideline for Adult Sedation, Pain Assessment, and Analgesia in a Low Resource Setting Intensive Care Unit: Review Article
【24h】

Evidence-Based Guideline for Adult Sedation, Pain Assessment, and Analgesia in a Low Resource Setting Intensive Care Unit: Review Article

机译:在低资源设定重症监护下的成人镇静,疼痛评估和镇痛的基于证据的指南:审查文章

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Agitation and anxiety occur frequently in ICU and affect about 30-80% of patients in ICU present with delirium worldwide, and it is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This review aimed to systematically review articles and finally draw an evidence-based guideline for an area with limited resources.Methods:The review was reported based on preferred reporting items for systemic and meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocol. We searched literature from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline database using keywords like the level of sedation, sedation score, pain assessment in ICU, and sedative drugs in ICU from an article published in English. After extraction with a patient population and exclusion, five randomized clinical trials, four systemic reviews and meta-analysis, four observation cohort study, and two practical guidelines were used for the review.Conclusion:In addition to high validity and reliability, RASS has the advantage of easiness to remember for nurses making it a preferred sedation assessment tool in an adult ICU setting. Light sedation with daily interruption was recommended with an aim of an awake and alert patient ready for the weaning trial. Propofol was preferred when sedation is for a short duration and when intermittent awakening is required. Ketamine is the preferred induction for asthmatic hypotensive and patient requiring prolonged continuous sedation. With a similar time for sedation, diazepam shows a shorter time for intubation compared to midazolam. Besides diazepam has shown a cheaper cost of sedation than midazolam. This makes it a drug of preference in a low resource setting.? 2020 Neme et al.
机译:背景:ICU经常发生搅拌和焦虑,并影响大约30-80%的ICU患者在全球谵妄,它与不良临床结果有关。该审查旨在系统地审查文章,最后为资源有限的地区绘制基于循证指南。方法:审查是根据全身和荟萃分析(PRISMA)议定书的首选报告项目。我们在PubMed,Google Scholar和Medline数据库中搜索了文学,使用称为ICU的镇静,镇静评分,疼痛评估水平,以及ICU中​​的ICU中的镇静药物从英语发表的文章中的镇静药物。在提取患者人口和排除后,五项随机临床试验,四项系统性评论和荟萃分析,四项观察队列研究和两项实用指南用于评论。结论:除了高效力和可靠性,RAS还有更容易记住护士的优势使其成为成人ICU设置中的首选镇静评估工具。建议使用日常中断的光镇静,目的是一种醒着和警报患者准备好断奶试验。当镇静是短持续时间并且需要间歇性觉醒时,优选的异丙酚是优选的。氯胺酮是对需要长时间连续镇静的哮喘低血压和患者的优选诱导。对于镇静的时间,与咪达唑仑相比,Diazepam显示出插管的时间较短。除了Diazepam,除咪达唑仑外,还显示出镇静的成本。这使得它在低资源环境中偏好。 2020 Neme等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号