首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships
【24h】

HIV/AIDS research in Africa and the Middle East: participation and equity in North-South collaborations and relationships

机译:非洲和中东艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究:南北合作与关系的参与和股权

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:HIV/AIDS has attracted considerable research attention since the 1980s. In the current context of globalization and the predominance of cooperative work, it is crucial to analyze the participation of the countries and regions where the infection is most prevalent. This study assesses the participation of African countries in publications on the topic, as well as the degree of equity or influence existing in North-South relations.METHODS:We identified all articles and reviews of HIV/AIDS indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. We analyzed the scientific production, collaboration, and contributions from African and Middle Eastern countries to scientific activity in the region. The concept of leadership, measured through the participation as the first author of documents in collaboration was used to determine the equity in research produced through international collaboration.RESULTS:A total of 68,808 documents published from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed. Researchers from North America and Europe participated in 82.14% of the global scientific production on HIV/AIDS, compared to just 21.61% from Africa and the Middle East. Furthermore, the publications that did come out of these regions was concentrated in a small number of countries, led by South Africa (41% of the documents). Other features associated with HIV/AIDS publications from Africa include the importance of international collaboration from the USA, the UK, and other European countries (75-93% of the documents) and the limited participation as first authors that is evident (30 to 36% of the documents). Finally, the publications to which African countries contributed had a notably different disciplinary orientation, with a predominance of research on public health, epidemiology, and drug therapy.CONCLUSIONS:It is essential to foster more balance in research output, avoid the concentration of resources that reproduces the global North-South model on the African continent, and focus the research agenda on local priorities. To accomplish this, the global North should strengthen the transfer of research skills and seek equity in cooperative ties, favoring the empowerment of African countries. These efforts should be concentrated in countries with low scientific activity and high incidence and prevalence of the disease. It is also essential to foster intraregional collaborations between African countries.
机译:背景:自20世纪80年代以来,艾滋病毒/艾滋病吸引了相当大的研究关注。在目前的全球化背景下和合作工作的优势,分析受感染最普遍的国家和地区的参与至关重要。本研究评估了非洲国家在南北关系中存在的题目的出版​​物,以及南北关系中存在的股权或影响程度。方法:我们确定了在科学核心系列网上编制的艾滋病毒/艾滋病的所有文章和评论。我们分析了来自非洲和中东国家的科学生产,合作和贡献,在该地区的科学活动中分析。通过参与作为合作文件第一作者来衡量的领导概念,用于确定通过国际合作产生的研究的股权。结果:分析了2010年至2017年出版的68,808份文件。北美和欧洲的研究人员参加了艾滋病毒/艾滋病全球科学生产的82.14%,而非洲和中东仅为21.61%。此外,这些地区的出版物集中在由南非领导的少数国家(占文件的41%)。与非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病出版物相关的其他特征包括国际合作从美国,英国和其他欧洲国家的国际合作(75-93%的文件),以及作为最明显的第一作者的有限参与(30至36个文件的百分比)。最后,非洲国家贡献的出版物具有明显不同的纪律取向,具有对公共卫生,流行病学和药物治疗的研究。结论:必须培养更多在研究产出中的平衡,避免资源集中在非洲大陆中再现全球南北模型,并将研究议程集中在当地优先事项上。为实现这一目标,全球北方应加强研究技能的转移,并寻求合作关系的股权,赋予赋予非洲国家的权力。这些努力应集中在具有低科学活动和高发病率和疾病的患病率的国家。促进非洲国家之间的内部合作也是至关重要的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号