首页> 外文期刊>Globalization and Health >The FCTC dilemma on heated tobacco products
【24h】

The FCTC dilemma on heated tobacco products

机译:加热烟草产品的FCTC困境

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background In October 2018, the Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC or Convention) adopted its first decision on novel and emerging tobacco products, including heated tobacco products (HTPs). The decision remains ambiguous, e.g. by making a distinction between tobacco sticks and HTP devices. Against this background, the article seeks to answer two interrelated questions: whether and to what extent HTPs are covered by the FCTC, and whether regime provided by the Convention is suitable for their regulation. Results HTPs need to be classified under the FCTC as tobacco products. The distinction made by the Conference of the Parties between sticks and devices leads however to unsatisfactory results as it creates loopholes in tobacco control standards existing at the international level. A better approach, as argued in this article, is to conceptualize the notion of ‘tobacco products’ in functional terms as a combination of both a device and stick. While subjecting HTPs to all FCTC disciplines is, in light of our current scientific knowledge, a rational approach, such classification can be modified in the future once a sufficient amount of new evidence on their risk profile is collected. Any decision on the optimal regulatory model for HTPs will need to take into account not only health risks and potential benefits for individual users, but also the specific systemic concerns (e.g. HTPs as a gateway product). The state of scientific research is however not the only factor that will determine the fate of HTPs under the Convention. What is equally important is a conceptualization of the FCTC’s objectives. If a complete eradication of the tobacco epidemic is the ultimate goal, reduced levels of risk may not be enough to justify the different (i.e. more lenient) regulatory regime for HTPs. Conclusions The Conference of the Parties should clarify the definition of tobacco products in light of recent changes in the market. When designing the regulatory regime for HTPs under the FCTC in the future, one has to consider not only scientific evidence but also pay attention to the objective of the Convention (or more generally to the values that underlie the current tobacco control paradigm).
机译:摘要背景于2018年10月,烟草控制框架公约(FCTC或公约)各方的会议通过了其关于新型和新兴烟草产品的首次决定,包括加热烟草产品(HTPS)。决定仍然含糊不清,例如通过在烟草杆和HTP设备之间进行区分。在此背景下,文章旨在回答两个相互关联的问题:FCTC是否以及在多大程度上是在何处,以及“公约”提供的政权是否适合其调节。结果HTPS需要在FCTC下分类为烟草产品。然而,棍棒和设备之间的各方会议的区别导致了不令人满意的结果,因为它在国际一级存在的烟草控制标准中创造了漏洞。如本文所说,更好的方法是将功能术语的“烟草产品”的概念概念化为设备和棒的组合。鉴于我们目前的科学知识,鉴于我们目前的科学知识,可将来会在收集其风险概况的足够数量的新证据。关于HTPS最佳监管模式的任何决定都需要考虑对个别用户的健康风险和潜在利益,也需要对特定的系统性问题(例如,HTPS作为网关产品)。然而,科学研究的状态并非唯一将确定“公约”下的HTPS命运的唯一因素。同样重要的是FCTC目标的概念化。如果完全消除烟草流行病是最终目标,则降低风险水平可能不足以证明不同的(即更宽敞)的HTPS监管制度。结论缔约方大会应根据市场近期变化澄清烟草产品的定义。在将来设计FCTC下的HTPS监管制度时,不仅需要考虑科学证据,还要注意公约的目标(或更一般于基于当前烟草控制范式的价值观)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号