首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Caseload and Case Fatality of Lassa Fever in Nigeria, 2001–2018: A Specialist Center's Experience and Its Implications
【24h】

Caseload and Case Fatality of Lassa Fever in Nigeria, 2001–2018: A Specialist Center's Experience and Its Implications

机译:尼日利亚兰萨热的案例和病情,2001-2018:专业中心的经验及其影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The general lack of comprehensive data on the trends of Lassa fever (LF) outbreaks contrasts with its widespread occurrence in West Africa and is an important constraint in the design of effective control measures. We reviewed the contribution of LF to morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients from 2001-2018 in the bid to address this gap. Methods: Observational study of LF morbidity and mortality from 2001-2018 in terms of the contribution of confirmed LF to admissions and deaths, and case fatality (CF) among patients with confirmed LF.at a specialist center in Nigeria. The diagnosis of LF was confirmed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, and means and frequencies were compared using ANOVA, and Χ2 and t-tests, with p-values 0.05 taken as significant. Results: The contribution of confirmed LF to deaths (362/9057, 4.0%) was significantly higher than to admissions (1298/185707, 0.7%; OR [95% CI] = 5.92 [5.25, 6.66], p 0.001). The average CF among patients with confirmed LF declined from 154/355 (43%) in 2001 – 2009 to 183/867 (21.1%) (OR [95% CI] = 2.86 [2.20, 3.74], p 0.001) in 2011 – 2018, following the establishment of a dedicated treatment unit in 2010.The annual CF declined from 94% in 2001 to 15% in 2018 whereas the case load increased from 0.26% to 3.37%. The outbreaks were characterized by irregular cycles of high case load in 2005-2007, 2012-2014 and 2016-2018, and progressive blurring of the seasonality. Conclusion: LF outbreaks in Nigeria have upgraded spatially and temporally, with the potential for cycles of increasing severity. The strategic establishment of LF surveillance and clinical case management centers could be a pragmatic and cost-effective approach to mitigating the outbreaks, particularly in reducing the associated CF. Urgent efforts are needed in reinvigorating control measures and the search for sustainable solutions are required.
机译:背景:围绕兰萨发热趋势的普遍缺乏综合数据(LF)爆发与西非广泛发生的对比,是有效控制措施设计的重要制约因素。我们从2001 - 2018年在出价中审查了LF在住院患者中的发病率和死亡率的贡献,以解决这一差距。方法:从尼日利亚确认的患者的委员会委员会的捐助和死亡的贡献和病情(CF)的贡献,LF发病率和死亡率的观察研究。使用逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)试验确认LF的诊断,使用ANOVA和χ2和T检验进行比较方法和频率,P值<0.05显着。结果:证实的LF对死亡(362/9057,4.0%)的贡献显着高于入院(1298/185707,0.7%;或[95%CI] = 5.92 [5.25,6.66],P 0.001) 。确认LF患者的平均CF从2001 - 2009年的154/355(43%)下降到183/867(21.1%)(或[95%CI] = 2.86 [2.20,3.74],P 0.001) 2011年 - 2018年,在2010年建立专门的待遇单位之后。年度CF在2001年的94%下降至2018年的15%,而案件负荷从0.26%增加到3.37%。爆发的特点是2005 - 2007年,2012 - 2014年和2016 - 2018年的高案例负荷的不规则循环,以及对季节性的逐步模糊。结论:尼日利亚的LF爆发已经在空间和时间上升级,具有增加严重程度的循环。 LF监测和临床案例管理中心的战略建立可能是减轻爆发的务实和成本效益的方法,特别是在减少相关的CF方面。在重新发明控制措施时需要紧急努力,并需要搜索可持续解决方案。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号