首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment
【24h】

Evaluating Public Health Interventions: A Neglected Area in Health Technology Assessment

机译:评估公共卫生干预:卫生技术评估中的忽视领域

获取原文
           

摘要

Public health (PH) interventions are crucial for ensuring sustainable healthcare services. Nevertheless, they represent a neglected area in the field health technology assessment (HTA) due to various methodological issues and their complex design that goes beyond clinical setting. The present study provides an environmental scan of HTA initiatives related to the assessment of PH technologies on a global level. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 85 HTA-related European and international societies, health bodies and networks from September 2018 to January 2019. The questionnaire contained four sections and 18 questions regarding activities related to evaluation of PH technologies, information on existing PH technologies and methodologies of assessment as well as barriers and facilitators to reaching a decision and implementing a PH technology. Among 52 survey responses, the majority of respondents came from European countries (35 %), followed by North American (27 %) and South America (19%) countries. Main type of organizations covered by our survey included HTA agencies, public administrations and research institutes. Seventy-one percent of institutions reported engagement in any aspect of HTA in the area of PH (N=37). Among those, 81% percent evaluated less than five PH technologies from 2013 to 2018. The most common barriers for reaching a decision on PH technologies were: lack of data, conflicting stakeholder priorities, and methodological issues. A total of 76 PH interventions were reported, and most cited initiatives were related to chronic disease screening, prevention of infectious diseases, and maternal, pre and neonatal screening. Our survey reported a rather limited involvement of HTA in the evaluation of PH technologies. In particular, evaluation of behavioral and lifestyle interventions remains extremely rare. Implementation of collaborative HTA approaches in the setting of PH practice and policy needs to be prioritized and further strengthened. Moreover, assuring reliable data structures and consolidation of HTA methods for the evaluation of PH technologies will be crucial for tackling the enormous burden of non-communicable diseases in societies.
机译:公共卫生(pH)干预对于确保可持续的医疗保健服务至关重要。尽管如此,由于各种方法问题及其复杂的设计,它们代表了现场健康技术评估(HTA)中的忽视区域,超出了临床环境。本研究提供了与全球水平对pH技术评估相关的HTA倡议的环境扫描。从2018年9月至2019年1月,我们在85个与HTA相关的欧洲和国际社会,卫生机构和网络中进行了横断面调查。调查问卷有四个部分和18个关于与pH技术评估有关的活动,现有pH技术的信息有关的活动和评估方法以及障碍和促进者,以达成决定和实施pH技术。在52个调查回复中,大多数受访者来自欧洲国家(35%),其次是北美(27%)和南美(19%)国家。我们的调查所涵盖的主要组织包括HTA机构,公共主管部门和研究机构。百分之七十一位机构报告了pH(n = 37)中HTA的任何方面的参与。其中81%的百分比从2013年到2018年评估了少于五个pH技术。达成对pH技术决定的最常见障碍是:缺乏数据,相互冲突的利益相关者优先事项和方法问题。报告了总共76个pH干预措施,大多数引用的举措与慢性疾病筛查,预防传染病和母体,前和新生儿筛查有关。我们的调查报告称HTA在评估pH技术时相当有限的参与。特别是,对行为和生活方式干预的评估仍然非常罕见。在pH实践和政策的制定中实施协同HTA方法需要优先考虑并进一步加强。此外,确保可靠的数据结构和HTA方法的评估方法对PH技术的评估将对解决社会中的非传染性疾病的巨大负担至关重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号