首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics >Invariance of the Response Processes Between Gender and Modes in an Assessment of Reading
【24h】

Invariance of the Response Processes Between Gender and Modes in an Assessment of Reading

机译:在评估阅读中性别和模式之间的响应过程的不变性

获取原文
           

摘要

In this paper, we developed a method to extract item-level response times from log data that are available in computer-based assessments (CBA) and paper-based assessments (PBA) with digital pens. Based on response times that were extracted using only time differences between responses, we used the bivariate generalized linear IRT model framework (B-GLIRT, Molenaar, Tuerlinckx & von der Maas, 2015) to investigate response times as indicators for response processes. A parameterization that includes an interaction between the latent speed factor and the latent ability factor in the cross-relation function was found to fit the data best in CBA and PBA. Data were collected with a within-subject design in a national add-on study to PISA 2012 administering two clusters of PISA 2009 reading units. After investigating the invariance of the measurement models for ability and speed between boys and girls, we found the expected gender effect in reading ability to coincide with a gender effect in speed in CBA. Taking this result as indication for the validity of the time measures extracted from time differences between responses, we analyzed the PBA data and found the same gender effects for ability and speed. Analyzing PBA and CBA data together we identified the ability mode effect as the latent difference between reading measured in CBA and PBA. Similar to the gender effect the mode effect in ability was observed together with a difference in the latent speed between modes. However, while the relationship between speed and ability is identical for boys and girls we found hints for mode differences in the estimated parameters of the cross-relation function used in the B-GLIRT model.
机译:在本文中,我们开发了一种从基于计算机的评估(CBA)和纸张的评估(PBA)中提供的日志数据中提取项目级响应时间的方法,其中包含数字笔。基于仅使用响应之间的时间差异提取的响应时间,我们使用了双方广义线性IRT模型框架(B-Glirt,Molenaar,TuerlinaR,2015)来调查响应时间作为响应过程的指标。发现包括潜伏功能之间的相互作用和跨关系功能中的潜在能力因数之间的相互作用,以适应CBA和PBA中最好的数据。在国家附加研究中,在对PISA 2012的国家附加研究中进行了一个主题设计,管理两种PISA 2009阅读单位集群。在调查男孩和女孩之间的能力和速度的测量模型的不变性之后,我们发现阅读能力与CBA中速度的性别效应相互作用的预期性别效果。将此结果作为响应之间的时间差异提取的时间措施的有效性,我们分析了PBA数据,发现了能力和速度相同的性别效应。将PBA和CBA数据分析在一起我们将能力模式效应作为CBA和PBA中测量的读数之间的潜在差异。类似于性别效果,可以将能力的模式效应与模式之间的潜速的差异一起观察到。然而,虽然男孩和女孩的速度和能力之间的关系是相同的,但我们发现了用于B-Glirt模型中使用的跨关系功能的估计参数的模式差异的提示。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号