首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Veterinary Science >Antimicrobial Use Indices—The Value of Reporting Antimicrobial Use in Multiple Ways Using Data From Canadian Broiler Chicken and Turkey Farms
【24h】

Antimicrobial Use Indices—The Value of Reporting Antimicrobial Use in Multiple Ways Using Data From Canadian Broiler Chicken and Turkey Farms

机译:抗微生物使用指数 - 以多种方式使用来自加拿大肉鸡鸡和土耳其农场的数据的报告抗菌用途的价值

获取原文
           

摘要

We have previously described the importance of using multiple indicators for reporting national farm-level antimicrobial use (AMU) information, but the distribution of flock-level AMU and how these indicators relate to each other has not yet been fully explored. Using farm-level surveillance data (2013-2019), for broiler chickens (n = 947 flocks) and turkeys (n = 427), this study aims to 1) characterize flock-level AMU and identify high users, 2) identify appropriate AMU indicators and biomass denominator (population correction unit [PCU]) vs. kg weight at pre-slaughter), and 3) make recommendations on the application to veterinarian-producer and national-level reporting. Diverse AMU patterns were identified in broiler chickens (156 patterns) and turkeys (68 patterns); of these, bacitracin, reported by 25% of broiler chicken and 19% of turkey producers, was the most frequently occurring pattern. Depending on the indicator chosen, variations in reported quantity of use, temporal trends and relative ranking of the antimicrobials changed. Quantitative AMU analysis yielded the following results for broiler chickens: mean 134 mg/PCU; 507 number (n) of Canadian (CA) defined daily doses (DDDvet) per 1,000 chicken-days and 18 nDDDvetCA/PCU. Analysis in turkey flocks yielded the following: mean 64 mg/PCU, 99 nDDDvetCA/1,000 turkey-days at risk and 9 nDDDvetCA/PCU. Flocks were categorized based on the percentiles of the mg/PCU distribution: “medium” to “low” users (≤75th percentile) and “high” users (75th percentile). The odds of being a high user in both broiler chickens and turkeys were significantly increased: if water medications were used, and if trimethoprim-sulfonamides, bacitracins, and tetracyclines were used. Pairwise correlation analysis showed moderate correlation between mg/PCU and the nDDDvetCA/1,000 animal days at risk and between mg/PCU and nDDDvetCA/PCU. Significantly high correlation between nDDDvetCA/1,000 animal days at risk and nDDDvetCA/PCU was observed, suggestive that either of these could be used for routine monitoring of trends in AMU. One source of discrepancy between the indicators was the antimicrobial. Understanding the choice of parameter input and effects on reporting trends in AMU will inform surveillance reporting best practices to help industry understand the impacts of their AMU reduction strategies and to best communicate the information to veterinarians, their producers, and other stakeholders.
机译:我们之前描述了使用多个指标报告国家农场级抗微生物使用(AMU)信息的重要性,而是群级AMU的分布以及这些指标如何彼此相关,尚未完全探索。使用农业级监控数据(2013-2019),对于肉鸡(n = 947群)和火鸡(n = 427),本研究旨在1)表征群级AMU并识别高用户,2)识别适当的AMU在屠宰前的指标和生物量分母(人口校正单元[PCU])与Kg重量),并提出了关于兽医制作和国家一级报告的申请的建议。在肉鸡(156种图案)和火鸡(68型图案)中鉴定了各种AMU模式;在这些中,甲硝酸甲硝酸辛素占25%的肉鸡和19%的土耳其生产商是最常见的模式。根据所选择的指标,报告的使用量,时间趋势和抗微生物的相对排名变化。定量AMU分析产生以下结果对肉鸡:平均134mg / PCU;加拿大(CA)的507号(N)定义每1,000鸡天和18个NDDDVetca / PCU的每日剂量(DDDVET)。土耳其羊群的分析产生了以下内容:平均64毫克/ PCU,99个NDDDVETCA / 1,000风险和9个NDDDVETCA / PCU的土耳其日。群体基于MG / PCU分布的百分比分类:“媒体”到“低”用户(≤75百分位数)和“高”用户(> 75百分位数)。在肉鸡鸡和火鸡两种高级用户的几率显着增加:如果使用水药物,则使用甲苯二甲酸硫酰胺,甲腈和四环素。成对相关性分析显示Mg / PCU与NDDDVETCA / 1,000种风险和MG / PCU和NDDDVETCA / PCU之间的中等相关性。观察到风险和NDDDVETCA / PCU的NDDDVETCA / 1,000个动物天之间的显着高,暗示其中任何一个都可以用于常规监测AMU的趋势。指标之间的一个差异源是抗菌剂。了解参数输入的选择和对AMU的报告趋势的影响将为监控报告最佳实践,以帮助行业了解他们的AMU减少战略的影响,并最好将信息传达给兽医,他们的生产者和其他利益攸关方。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号