首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical focus >Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
【24h】

Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

机译:单侧与双边经皮椎弓根螺钉固定在微创矫形突变锤腰椎间融合中

获取原文
           

摘要

Object Clinical results for unilateral pedicle screw fixation after lumbar interbody fusion have been reported to be as good as those for bilateral instrumentation. However, no studies have directly compared unilateral and bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The purpose of this study was to determine whether unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is comparable with bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in 1-segment MIS TLIF. Methods This was a prospective randomized study of 53 patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation after MIS TLIF for 1-segment lumbar degenerative disc disease. Twenty-six patients were assigned to a unilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group and 27 patients were assigned to a bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation group. Operative time, blood loss, clinical outcomes (that is, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and visual analog scale [VAS] scores), complication rates, and fusion rates were assessed using CT scanning 2 years after surgical treatment. Results The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and operated level, and they did not differ significantly in the length of follow-up (27.5 [Group 1] vs 28.9 [Group 2] months) or clinical results. Both groups showed substantial improvements in VAS and ODI scores 2 years after surgical treatment. The groups differed significantly in operative time (unilateral 84.2 minutes; bilateral 137.6 minutes), blood loss (unilateral 92.7 ml; bilateral, 232.0 ml), fusion rate (unilateral 84.6%; bilateral 96.3%), and postoperative scoliotic change (unilateral 23.1%; bilateral 3.7%). Conclusions Unilateral and bilateral screw fixation after MIS TLIF produced similar clinical results. Although perioperative results were better with unilateral screw fixation, the long-term results were better with bilateral screw fixation, suggesting bilateral screw fixation is a better choice after MIS TLIF.
机译:据报道,腰部椎间融合后单侧椎弓根螺钉固定的对象临床结果与双边仪器一样好。然而,在微创手术(MIS)对于晶状体腰椎间融合(TLIF)的微创手术(MIS)之后,没有研究直接比较单侧和双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定。本研究的目的是确定单侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定是否与双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定在1段MIS TLIF中。方法这是一个前瞻性随机研究,对53名患者进行了53名患者,在MIS TLIF后进行了一个单侧或双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定,用于1段腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病。将二十六名患者分配到单侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定组,27名患者分配到双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定组。手术治疗后2年评估手术时间,失血,临床结果(即Oswestry残疾指数[ODI]和视觉模拟尺度[VAS]分数),并发症率和融合率。结果2组在年龄,性别,术前诊断和操作水平中相似,在随访时间内没有显着差异(27.5 [第1组[第2组[第2组])或临床结果。两组在手术治疗后2年内,VAS和ODI分数显示出大量改善。这些组在手术时间(单侧84.2分钟;双侧137.6分钟),失血(单侧92.7ml;双侧,232.0ml),融合率(单侧84.6%;双侧96.3%)和术后疾病变化(单侧23.1%) ;双侧3.7%)。结论MIS TLIF后单侧和双侧螺钉固定产生了类似的临床结果。虽然通过单侧螺钉固定围手术期结果较好,但长期螺杆固定的长期结果较好,暗示双侧螺钉固定在MIS TLIF后是更好的选择。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号