...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical focus >Accuracy analysis of fMRI and MEG activations determined by intraoperative mapping
【24h】

Accuracy analysis of fMRI and MEG activations determined by intraoperative mapping

机译:通过术中映射确定FMRI和MEG激活的准确性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE By looking at how the accuracy of preoperative brain mapping methods vary according to differences in the distance from the activation clusters used for the analysis, the present study aimed to elucidate how preoperative functional neuroimaging may be used in such a way that maximizes the mapping accuracy. METHODS The eloquent function of 19 patients with a brain tumor or cavernoma was mapped prior to resection with both functional MRI (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). The mapping results were then validated using direct cortical stimulation mapping performed immediately after craniotomy and prior to resection. The subset of patients with equivalent MEG and fMRI tasks performed for motor (n = 14) and language (n = 12) were evaluated as both individual and combined predictions. Furthermore, the distance resulting in the maximum accuracy, as evaluated by the J statistic, was determined by plotting the sensitivities and specificities against a linearly increasing distance threshold. RESULTS fMRI showed a maximum mapping accuracy at 5 mm for both motor and language mapping. MEG showed a maximum mapping accuracy at 40 mm for motor and 15 mm for language mapping. At the standard 10-mm distance used in the literature, MEG showed a greater specificity than fMRI for both motor and language mapping but a lower sensitivity for motor mapping. Combining MEG and fMRI showed a maximum accuracy at 15 mm and 5 mm—MEG and fMRI distances, respectively—for motor mapping and at a 10-mm distance for both MEG and fMRI for language mapping. For motor mapping, combining MEG and fMRI at the optimal distances resulted in a greater accuracy than the maximum accuracy of the individual predictions. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the accuracy of language and motor mapping for both fMRI and MEG is heavily dependent on the distance threshold used in the analysis. Furthermore, combining MEG and fMRI showed the potential for increased motor mapping accuracy compared to when using the modalities separately.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01535430 (clinicaltrials.gov).
机译:目的通过观察术前脑映射方法的准确性如何根据用于分析的激活簇的差异而变化,本研究旨在阐明术前功能神经模仿的方式,可以以最大化映射精度最大化的方式使用。方法使用函数MRI(FMRI)和磁性脑图(MEG)在切除之前,映射了19例脑肿瘤或气孔瘤患者的雄激函数。然后使用Craniotomy和切除前立即进行直接皮质刺激映射进行映射结果。对电动机(n = 14)和语言(n = 12)进行的等效MEG和FMRI任务的患者的子集被评估为个人和组合预测。此外,通过绘制敏感度和特异性来利用线性增加的距离阈值来确定导致最大精度的距离。结果FMRI为电机和语言映射显示5 mm的最大映射精度。 MEG为40 mm表示电机的最大映射精度和用于语言映射的15毫米。在文献中使用的标准10毫米距离,MEG显示出比电机和语言映射的FMRI更大的特异性,但电动机映射的灵敏度较低。组合MEG和FMRI分别为15毫米和5mm-MEG和FMRI距离的最大精度,用于电机映射,距离MEG和FMRI的10毫米距离为语言映射。对于电动机映射,在最佳距离处结合MEG和FMRI导致比各个预测的最大精度更高的准确性。结论本研究表明,FMRI和MEG的语言和电机映射的准确性严重依赖于分析中使用的距离阈值。此外,与单独使用方式相比,组合MEG和FMRI显示出增加的电机映射精度的可能性。临床试验登记号码:NCT01535430(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号