...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgical focus >Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases
【24h】

Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases

机译:医疗事故和脑膜瘤:47例分析

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE Among medical practices, surgical fields, including neurosurgery, are at a high risk for medical malpractice litigation. With meningiomas contributing to 10% of the total neurosurgery litigation cases, the aim of this study was to identify demographic characteristics, reasons for litigation, and surgical complications commonly reported in these cases. This analysis serves to increase neurosurgeons’ awareness of factors associated with medical malpractice litigation. METHODS The online legal database Westlaw was utilized to query public litigation cases related to the medical management of meningiomas between December 1985 and May 2020. Variables extracted included the following: plaintiff and defendant demographics, litigation category, plaintiff medical complaints, and trial outcomes. The authors compared these characteristics between cases with decisions in favor of the defendant and those with decisions in favor of the plaintiff. RESULTS A total of 47 cases met the inclusion criteria. Failure to diagnose (68.1%) was the most common type of malpractice claim, and surgical complications (19.1%), motor weakness (33%), and financial loss (33%) were cited as the most common postoperative complaints. Individual specialties that most often required defense due to malpractice claims were radiology (21.7%) and neurosurgery (19.6%). The jury verdict was in favor of the defense in 51.1% of cases and in favor of the plaintiff in 27.7% of cases. A settlement was reached in 19.1% of cases. The mean payout for a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was $3,409,650.22, while the mean payout for settlements was $867,555.56. The greatest average payout for specialties was in neurosurgery at $3,414,400, followed by radiology at $3,192,960. Cases with a verdict in favor of the plaintiff were more likely to involve an internal medicine physician as a defendant (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Over one-half of the cases resulted in a defendant’s verdict with failure to diagnose cited as the most common reason for litigation. Radiology and neurosurgery were the most common specialties for legal cases and also had some of the largest average payouts based on specialty. Motor weakness and financial loss were the most common plaintiff postoperative complaints. These findings may inform surgeons on active measures to take, such as increasing focus on diagnostic accuracy and reducing specific postoperative complaints, such as motor weakness, through risk management and prophylactic measures, to reduce unfavorable legal outcomes.
机译:医疗实践的目的,包括神经外科,包括神经外科的手术田都有高风险的医疗事故诉讼。随着脑膜瘤的含量占神经外科诉讼案例的10%,本研究的目的是识别人口统计特征,诉讼原因,以及在这些情况下常见的手术并发症。该分析用于增加与医疗诉讼相关的因素的神经外科医生的认识。方法使用在线法律数据库Westlaw在1985年12月和5月20日期间询问与脑膜瘤的医学管理有关的公共诉讼案件。提取的变量包括:原告和被告人人口统计数据,诉讼类别,原告医疗投诉和审判结果。作者将这些特征与有利于被告的决定和有利于原告的决定之间的这些特征。结果共有47例达到纳入标准。未能诊断(68.1%)是最常见的弊端索赔和手术并发症(19.1%),电机弱点(33%),并被认为是最常见的术后投诉。由于弊端索赔导致的个人专业是最常见的防御是放射学(21.7%)和神经外科(19.6%)。陪审团判决有利于51.1%的案件中的防御,并赞成27.7%的案件。 19.1%的病例达成了解决方案。判决的平均支付支持原告是3,409,650.22美元,而定居点的平均支付是867,555.56美元。特色的最大平均支付是Neurosurgery的3,414,400美元,其次是3,192,960美元的放射学。判决有利于原告的案件更有可能让内在医学医师作为被告(P = 0.007)。结论超过一半的病例导致被告的判决失败,未被诊断为诉讼最常见的原因。放射学和神经外科是法律案件中最常见的专业,也有一些基于专业的最大平均支付。运动弱点和财务流失是最常见的原告术后投诉。这些调查结果可能会使外科医生在积极措施上,例如越来越关注诊断准确性和降低特定术后投诉,通过风险管理和预防措施减少电机弱点,以减少不利的法律结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号