...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Meniscal Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:半月板修复的临床和放射性结果与内侧半月板根撕裂的部分裂缝切除术:系统评论和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Given the superiority of meniscal repair over partial meniscectomy according to biomechanical data, the clinical outcomes of meniscal repair are likely to be better than those of partial meniscectomy for a medial meniscus root tear (MMRT). Purpose/Hypothesis: This review was designed to compare the clinical and radiological results between meniscal repair and partial meniscectomy for MMRTs. It was hypothesized that meniscal repair would result in better clinical and radiological results compared with partial meniscectomy. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Studies were included in the review if they (1) included patients with MMRTs who underwent primary arthroscopic meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy and (2) analyzed validated patient-reported outcomes and/or radiological evaluations. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated to compare partial meniscectomy with meniscal repair for each outcome. Results: A total of 13 studies were included. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.5 and 47.2 months in the meniscal repair group and partial meniscectomy group, respectively. The change in the Lysholm score from preoperatively to postoperatively was statistically significantly in favor of meniscal repair (OR, 2.20 [95% CI, 1.55-3.12]), while no difference was found with respect to the change in the Tegner score between the 2 surgical approaches (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.65-2.24]). The prevalence of postoperative severe knee osteoarthritis (OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.17-0.54]) as well as that of reoperations (OR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.01-0.19]) were significantly in favor of meniscal repair. Conclusion Better outcomes were seen after meniscal repair compared with partial meniscectomy for MMRTs, with greater improvements in Lysholm scores, and lower rates of progression to knee osteoarthritis, and lower reoperation rate.
机译:背景:鉴于根据生物力学数据的部分半月岩切除术的优越性,半月板修复的临床结果可能比内半月板根撕裂(MMRT)的部分裂纹切除术。目的/假设:本综述旨在比较Mmrts Messiscal修复和部分裂缝切除术之间的临床和放射性结果。假设半月板修复将导致更好的临床和放射性结果与部分裂缝切除术相比。研究设计:系统评价;证据级别,4.方法:如果审查(1)包括患有MMRT的患者,则包括患有初级关节镜的MMRTS患者的研究,(2)分析过验证的患者报告的结果和/或放射性评估。概述差异比率(或者),计算95%的CIS,以比较每个结果的半月板修复的部分凌光切除术。结果:共有13项研究。半月板修复群和部分凌光切除术群体的后续行动持续时间为33.5%和47.2个月。从术前到术后的Lysholm评分的变化统计学上有利于半月板修复(或2.20 [95%CI,1.55-3.12]),而在2之间的TEGNER评分的变化没有发现差异手术方法(或1.21 [95%CI,0.65-2.24])。术后严重膝关节骨关节炎(或0.31 [95%CI,0.17-0.54])以及重新进展的患病率显着地有利于半月板修复的速度和重新进一步的速度(或0.05 [95%[95%[95%,0.01-0.19])。结论半月板修复后看到了更好的结果与MMRTS的部分裂缝切除术相比,Lysholm评分的更大提高,较低的进展速度降低了膝关节骨关节炎,再次再购率降低。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号