首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >A prospective comparative study of arthroscopic Brostrom procedure alone vs. Brostrom-Gould procedure in the repair of isolated ATFL injury at follow-up in one year
【24h】

A prospective comparative study of arthroscopic Brostrom procedure alone vs. Brostrom-Gould procedure in the repair of isolated ATFL injury at follow-up in one year

机译:关节镜下的前瞻性比较研究单独对比较 - 在​​一年内随访中分离的ATFL损伤修复

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould procedure is the reference technique in the treatment of isolated anterior talofibular ligament injury. Extensor retinaculum reinforcement uses the proximal part, without any mechanical function. The objective is to compare the isolated ATFL reinsertion technique with reinsertion + biological augmentation. Methods: This is a prospective study that compares the isolated ATFL reinsertion technique (Brostrom) vs. reinsertion + retinaculum reinforcement (Brostrom-Gould) at one year follow-up. 2 groups of 25 patients were selected. The two groups matched in terms of age, weight, and gender. All patients presented with isolated ATFL with stage 1 or 2 lesions according to the French arthroscopy society (SFA) classification. Patients were clinically evaluated preoperative and in one year with the FAAM and FAOS scores and the recurrence rate was assessed as well as passive joint amplitudes pre- and postoperatively. There was a single operator for the series and the surgical technique was chosen before surgery. Patients had the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol (ankle splint to be worn for 30 days with weight-bearing, no work in varus before 30 days, rehabilitation at D2). Results: Regarding clinical scores, in both groups there was a significant improvement in the sports FAAM and FAOS scores in the postoperative period. In the isolated Brostrom group, the FAAM score increased from 20 to 29 and the FAOS score from 75% to 95%. In the Brostrom-Gould group, the FAAM score increased from 19 to 30 and the FAOS score from 77% to 96%. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. We identified no postoperative complications in either group. A sprain recurred in 2 patients in the Brostrom-Gould group and in 3 patients in the isolated Brostrom group. The sprain was mild in all cases and was controlled by ultrasound. The joint amplitudes in active plantar flexion were 36° in the isolated Brostrom group and 34° in the Brostrom-Gould group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our study shows that there is no difference between the isolated arthroscopic Brostrom technique and the Brostrom-Gould technique in the management of isolated ATFL grade 1 and 2 lesions in terms of recurrence and clinical scores and that the isolated Brostrom technique can be used to treat these lesions.
机译:目的:关节镜的性感 - 古尔德手术是治疗孤立前际韧带损伤的参考技术。延伸阀避压素钢筋使用近端部分,无需任何机械功能。目的是将隔离的ATFL重新插入技术与重新插入+生物增强进行比较。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,将分离的ATFL重新插入技术(BROSTROM)与REINSERTION +视网膜素增强(BROSTROM-GOULD)进行了一年的后续行动。选择2组25名患者。两组在年龄,体重和性别方面匹配。根据法国关节镜学术(SFA)分类,所有患者均用阶段1或2病变患者。患者在术前评估,并在一年内与FAAM和粮农组织评分进行评估,并评估复发率和术后的被动关节幅度。该系列有一个操作员,手术前选择手术技术。患者具有相同的术后康复方案(踝关节夹板30天用负重磨损,在30天之前在varus中没有工作,D2的康复)。结果:关于临床评分,两组在术后时期的体育粮食群和粮农组织得分有重大改善。在孤立的布切马集团中,FAAM得分从20到29增加,粮农组织得分从75%到95%。在大古尔德集团中,粮农组织得分从19到30增加,粮农组织得分从77%到96%。 2组之间没有显着差异。我们在任何一个群体中均无术后并发症。在Brostrom-Gould组中的2例患者中重复了扭伤 - 在孤立的复古组中的3例患者。扭伤在所有情况下都温和,并通过超声控制。活性跖屈的关节幅度在孤立的布切马组中为36°,在Brostrom-Gould组中为34°。 2组之间没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究表明,在复发和临床评分方面,分离的关节镜惊厥技术和孤立的关节镜下技术和软化物 - 古尔德技术在分离的ATFL级1和2病变中的诊断中没有差异,并且可以使用孤立的大动力技术治疗这些病变。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号