首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Agriculture Research >Impact of Social and Institutional Factors on the Uptake of Conservation Agriculture: A Case of Zambia and Zimbabwe
【24h】

Impact of Social and Institutional Factors on the Uptake of Conservation Agriculture: A Case of Zambia and Zimbabwe

机译:社会和机构因素对保护农业吸收的影响 - 以赞比亚和津巴布韦为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Conservation agriculture (CA) involves the practice of three interlinked principles of minimum soil disturbance, a permanent soil cover and crop rotation. Despite the many stated benefits of the technology, its uptake in Africa has been slow. This study applies the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the attitudes, the role of the social system (social influence, by-laws and customs) and the institutional environment in the decision to practice CA principles and on the area under CA in Choma, Zambia and Nkayi, Zimbabwe. The study finds differing attitudes between districts towards CA outcomes. Local by-laws have a positive correlation with the practice of minimum soil disturbance but negative correlations with the practice of soil cover and crop rotation. Social influence and customs have significant relationships with the area under CA. Institutional support is perceived to be necessary for the practice of minimum soil disturbance but not so for the practice of crop rotation or on the area under CA. We conclude that the attitudes towards CA depend on the performance of the CA options promoted to farmers while the effects of the social system components and institutional factors on the uptake of CA depends on how the particular CA principle fits into the social and institutional environment in which it is promoted. We recommend agriculture extension services and policymakers to pay more attention to these issues in the promotion of CA.
机译:保护性农业(CA)涉及的土壤最小的干扰,永久土壤覆盖和作物轮作的三个相互关联的原则的做法。尽管技术的诸多好处表示,其在非洲的摄取一直很缓慢。这项研究应用计划行为的理论研究态度,社会系统的作用(社会影响力,通过-法律和惯例)和制度环境在决定实践CA原则,在Choma,赞比亚CA下的面积和Nkayi,津巴布韦。研究发现不同地区之间的态度CA的结果。地方法规与土壤最小的干扰,但用土壤覆盖和作物轮作的实践负相关的做法呈正相关。社会影响力和习俗的情况下有CA的面积显著关系机构支持被认为是必要的土壤最小干扰的做法,但并不因此对于作物轮作的实践或下CA.面积我们的结论是对CA的态度取决于晋升为农民CA方案的性能,同时在社会系统组件和制度因素对CA的吸收效果取决于如何在特定的CA原理装配到社会和制度环境中,它是促进。我们建议农业推广服务和决策者更加重视这些问题,在促进CA的

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号