Communication between different branches of the brachial plexus is a common phenomenon that has several clinical and surgical implications. Forty-eight upper extremities were dissected to investigate the communication between median and musculocutaneous nerves. The cadavers were fixed in a mixture of four fixatives through femoral canulation. Communications were observed in two of the left arms. Their points of origin and course were evaluated. One of the biceps brachii muscles possessed an accessory head originating from the anterior surface of the left humerus. These anatomical variations are of crucial importance in brachial plexus block in the upper arm. Introduction Variations in the formation and branching pattern of the brachial plexus are well documented (Williams et al., 1999; Ken, 1918; Linell, 1921; Poynter, 1920). Some of these variations include prefixed and postfixed brachial plexus. In the former, the brachial plexus receives contribution from the ventral ramus of the 4 th cervical spinal nerve, but contribution from the ventral ramus of the 1 st thoracic spinal nerve is reduced or absent. In the postfixed type of formation, the 2 nd thoracic nerve gives a contribution while a contribution from the 5 th spinal nerve is reduced or absent (Williams et al., 1999). This is against the normal pattern in which the brachial plexus is formed by the ventral rami of the 5 th to 8 th cervical spinal nerves and a ventral ramus of the 1 st thoracic spinal nerve.The median nerve is formed by union of two roots from the lateral (C5,6,7) and medial (C8, T1) cords (Pansky, 1984; Snell, 1995) while the musculocutaneous nerve (C5,6,7) arises from the lateral cord of the brachial plexus. According to Tountas and Bergaman (1993), the musculocutaneous nerve arises from the lateral cord in 90.5%, from the lateral and posterior cord in 4%, from the medial cord in 2% and has two separate bundles from the medial and lateral cords in 1.4%. Sometimes it sends a branch back to the median nerve in the brachium (Williams et al., 1999; Arora and Dhingra, 2005). Williams et al. (1999) stated that some fibers of the median nerve may run in the musculocutaneous nerve leaving it to join their main trunk. Crossing over of nerve fibres between the median nerve and the ulnar nerve in the forearm has been described as Martin-Gruber connections (Nakashima, 1993; Taams, 1997; Shu & Chantelot, 1999). These connections occur mostly in the forearm and have been implicated to cause confusion in the assessment of nerve injuries, carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and leprosy neuropathy (Buschbacher, 1999).In present study we present abnormal communications between musculocutaneous and median nerves among Nigerian cadavers and discuss their surgical implications. Case Report During a routine dissection of twenty-four (24) formalin-fixed cadavers (23 males & 1 female) for medical students training at Igbinedion University, Okada, Nigeria, abnormal communications between the median and musculocutaneous nerves were unilaterally observed on the left brachia of two adult male cadavers. The cadavers were fixed by femoral canulation and injection of a fluid containing 10% formalin, liquid phenol, methylated spirit and glycerol. They were kept in storage tanks containing weak formalin solution for the period of 3 months before commencement of routine dissection. They are normally returned back to the weak formalin solution after dissection to prevent hardening and maceration. In one of the cadavers (Figure 1), the abnormal branch of the musculocutaneous nerve was found originating approximately at the mid point level of the brachial region distal to the insertion of the coracobrachialis muscle. It coursed inferiorly between the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles for about 4.2cm and joined the median nerve 8.7cm superior to the base of the cubital fossa. Giving its accessory branch and the nerve to the biceps brachii and brachialis muscle, the musculoc
展开▼
