首页> 外文期刊>Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research >Comparison of efficacy and safety profiles of epidural analgesia and opioid analgesia in Chinese patients with thoracic trauma: A preliminary report
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy and safety profiles of epidural analgesia and opioid analgesia in Chinese patients with thoracic trauma: A preliminary report

机译:胸腔创伤患者硬膜外镇痛和阿片类药物镇痛疗效和安全谱的比较:初报

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of epidural analgesia (EA) and opioid analgesia (OA) in Chinese patients with thoracic trauma (TT). Methods: Patients with confirmed diagnosis of thoracic trauma were given either EA (via a catheter) or slow-release OA. The following efficacy variables were assessed in the two treatment groups: pain score, and changes in cytokine and catecholamine levels from baseline after treatment. Moreover, respiratory parameters were determined before and after treatment. The safety associated with each anesthesia was also evaluated. Quantitative data were analyzed either with Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney test, while categorical data were analyzed using Fisher exact or Chi-square test, based on data size. Results: A total of 200 patients completed the study (100 patients in each group). Pain, as assessed by verbal rating scale (VRS), was slightly lower in patients after treatment with EA, when compared to the patients treated with OA. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p 0.05). Maximum inspiratory force (cmH 2 O) and tidal volume (liters) were slightly improved in patients treated with EA, when compared to OA-treated patients, although the difference was not statistically significant (p 0.05). Moreover, the two treatments produced comparable levels of cytokines and catecholamines. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety data for EA and OA in Chinese non-obese patients with TT indicate numerically favorable outcome for EA, when compared to OA.
机译:目的:将硬膜外镇痛(EA)和阿片类药物镇痛(OA)的胸腔创伤(TT)患者的疗效和安全谱进行比较。方法:胸腔创伤确诊的患者被ea(通过导管)或缓慢释放的OA给出。在两种治疗组中评估以下疗效变量:疼痛评分,以及治疗后基线的细胞因子和儿茶素水平的变化。此外,在治疗之前和之后测定呼吸参数。还评估了与每种麻醉相关的安全性。通过学生的T-Test或Mann-Whitney测试分析定量数据,而基于数据大小,使用Fisher精确或Chi-Square测试分析分类数据。结果:共有200名患者完成研究(每组100名患者)。通过口头评级规模(VRS)评估的疼痛在与EA治疗后患者略低,与OA治疗的患者相比。然而,差异没有统计学意义(P <0.05)。与OA治疗的患者相比,在ea治疗的患者中,最大吸气力(CMH 2 O)和潮气量(升)略有改善,但差异没有统计学意义(P <0.05)。此外,两种治疗产生了可比水平的细胞因子和儿茶酚胺。结论:在与OA相比,中国非肥胖患者EA和OA中ea和OA的疗效和安全数据表明EA的数量有利的结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号