...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine Research >Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Complication in Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Gastrointestinal Bleeding as a Complication in Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

机译:胃肠道出血作为连续流动性室外辅助装置的并发症:通过Meta分析进行系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) has become predominant in this era of medicine. It is commonly used as a bridge to transplant, recovery and as a destination therapy for patients with severe heart failure, who are not responsive to maximum optimal management or ineligible for transplant. However, several complications are known to occur with the use of these devices. In this research, we will compare gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who used centrifugal flow versus axial flow VADs. We hope that the result of this meta-analysis and the review presented provide adequate information to future researchers, physicians and other healthcare professionals who are interested in this topic. Methods: Published articles evaluated for inclusion were obtained from MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov, and international clinical trials registry. This research was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Procured articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Only randomized control trials and observational studies were used. Quality assessment was done with Cochrane Collaboration’s tool (RoB.2 with visualization through robviz) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Data analysis was carried out with the use of R data analysis tool (version 4.0.0; release date: April 24th, 2020). Results: At the end of this meta-analysis, the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding was not significantly different between both groups; with odds ratio (OR): 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65 - 1.00; P value = 0.05. Between-study variance (Tau-squared) was zero (0), standard error (SE) = 0.06. The degree of heterogeneity measured with I-squared statistic was 0% (minimal). Egger’s regression test was not statistically significant, P = 0.93. Symmetry of distribution was observed on the funnel plot. Trim and fill analysis showed no missing studies on the left; SE = 1.68. Conclusions: The result obtained from this research indicates that the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding is not significantly different in both groups of patients, irrespective of the type of continuous flow VAD used. Although, the study sample used in this meta-analysis was limited.
机译:背景:使用心室辅助装置(VADS)在本医学时代变得占主导地位。它通常用作用于移植,恢复和作为具有严重心力衰竭患者的目的地治疗的桥梁,该患者对最多最佳管理或不符合移植的患者并不敏感。然而,已知使用这些装置发生了几种并发症。在这项研究中,我们将比较使用离心流量与轴向流动VAD的患者的胃肠道出血。我们希望这一元分析和审查所产生的结果为未来的研究人员,医师和其他对本主题感兴趣的医疗保健专业人员提供了足够的信息。方法:评价已纳入的已发表的文章是从Medline(Pubmed),Cochrane,EBSCO,Clinicaltrials.gov和国际临床试验登记处获得的。该研究根据首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南进行。由两个独立审稿人审查采购的文章。仅使用随机对照试验和观察研究。通过Cochrane协作的工具(通过Robviz可视化)和纽卡斯尔 - 渥太华规模(NOS)进行质量评估。使用R数据分析工具进行数据分析(第4.0.0版;发布日期:4月24日,2020)。结果:在该荟萃分析结束时,两组之间的胃肠出血的发生并没有显着差异;赔率比(或):0.81; 95%置信区间(CI):0.65 - 1.00; p值= 0.05。 - 研究之间的差异(TAU平方)为零(0),标准误差(SE)= 0.06。用I级统计测量的异质性程度为0%(最小)。 Egger的回归测试没有统计学上显着,p = 0.93。在漏斗图上观察到分布的对称性。修剪和填充分析显示左侧没有缺失的研究; se = 1.68。结论:从该研究中获得的结果表明,两组患者中,胃肠出血的发生并没有显着差异,而不管使用的连续流动VAD的类型。虽然,在该荟萃分析中使用的研究样本有限。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号