首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Sinafricology: A Paradigm Shift from African Studies to Chinese Africology/Africanology in Chinese Academia
【24h】

Sinafricology: A Paradigm Shift from African Studies to Chinese Africology/Africanology in Chinese Academia

机译:中国学术界的非洲研究从非洲研究的范式转移

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Focus: The present article advocates an “Afrocentric study of Africa” in Chinese academia, examines the concepts of “ Afrocentricity”, “Africology”, “Africanology” and finally proposes “Sinafricology” as a new the terminology expressing a Paradigm shift from the existing traditional African Studies to a sort of Chinese Africology/Africanology that should be promoted in Chinese Academia. Methodology: The content of this paper relies primarily on written documents (including books, scientific journals, articles, and official reports) most of which are available online as well as on the author’s teaching experience in Chinese and African Universities. Findings: 1) The hundred years’ narrow and inert framework of “Sino-Western duality thinking” instilled into the Chinese scholarship circles by the Western ideological imperialism of the 19 th and 20 th centuries have somehow overshadowed African Studies in the today’s Chinese Academia. 2) With “ Afrocentricity” as a theoretical foundation, “Africology” & “Africanology” reflect the historical specificities and cultural responses of Africans from Mainland and Diasporas with regards to the universal cultural imperialism that Africa throughout history has been confronted with. 3) An “Afrocentric study of Africa” in Chinese academia is a must. For, they will be no deep understanding of the “Africana phenomena” by the Chinese scholarship without the thorough exploration of the central concepts of “ Afrocentricity”, “Africology”, and “Africanology”. 4) “Sinafricology” as a sort of Chinese “Africology”/“Africanology”, reflects a new horizon of African Studies in Chinese Academia with Africans as subjects rather than objects, while embracing the Chinese characteristics of modern academia. “Sinafricology” can achieve its goals through a 5-layers’ approach, namely the Theoretical, Methodological, Content Knowledge, Institutional and Governmental layers. Conclusion & Suggestions: Based on the aforementioned findings, this article holds that an “Afrocentric study of Africa” is of an urgent need for the domestic development of contemporary Chinese social sciences. The mainstream ideologies of Africanists of African origin should be the core lenses through which any in-depth study of Africa should be undertaken. Therefore, a Paradigm Shift from African Studies to Chinese Africology/Africanology or “Sinafricology” in Chinese Academia is strongly suggested, “Sinafricology” will aim at providing its learners with an Afrocentric approach of the African reality while embracing the Chinese characteristics of modern academia.
机译:研究重点:本文倡导中国学术界的“非洲非洲”,研究“无论是非洲心力学”,“非洲学”,“非洲主义”,最终提出“北非科学”作为一个新的术语,即表达了一个人的术语现有的传统非洲研究,以在中国学术界促进的一种中国非法/非洲学研究。方法论:本文的内容主要依赖于书面文件(包括书籍,科学期刊,条款和官方报告),其中大部分可获得在线以及作者在中非大学的教学经验。调查结果:1)百年“中西部二元思想”陷入中国奖学金的狭窄和惰性框架,由西方思想帝国主义19世纪和20世纪的思想帝国主义在今天的中国学术界的非洲非洲学习中有一些黯然失色。 2)以“非线电点归”为理论基础,“非洲主义”和“非洲主义”反映了非洲大陆和侨民的历史特异性和文化反应,以至于普遍的文化帝国主义,即非洲历史上的非洲面临。 3)中国学术界中的“非洲非洲非洲”是必须的。因为,他们将无法深入了解中国奖学金的“非洲人现象”,而不彻底探索“无论是非线性”,“非法”和“非洲主义”的中央观念。 4)作为一种中文“非洲的”/“非洲主义”,反映了非洲学术界的新地平线,非洲人与非洲人而不是物品,同时拥抱了现代学术界的中国特色。 “SINAFRICORY”可以通过5层的方法实现其目标,即理论,方法,内容知识,制度和政府层。结论与建议:根据上述调查结果,本文认为,“非洲的非洲专业研究”是迫切需要当代中国社会科学的发展。非洲非洲的非洲主义的主流意识形态应该是核心镜片,通过该核心镜片应通过该核心镜片,通过该核心镜片应进行非洲的任何深入研究。因此,强烈建议,从非洲研究中的非洲研究或“北非文物”的范式转变,“派字学”将旨在为学习者提供非洲现实的非管理方法,同时拥抱现代学术界的中国特色。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号