Article 35 of the Marriage Law paragraph (1) states: Community property is property acquired by a couple during marriage. KHI article 94 states that community property in polygamous marriages is separated and independent. However, there is an opinion stating that article 94 is unfair for first wife, because they received the least portion among the other wives. In fact, first wife accompanied her husband for a longer time, and continued to accompany him in the next marriage. Of course it is considered unfair because first wife suffer the most, especially in terms of mental condition, because no woman is actually willing to share her husband with other women. The technical administration and technical guidelines for the Religious Courts are applied in the Religion Court based on the decision of the Chair of the Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia Number: KMA/032/SK/IV/2006 concerning the implementation of "Book II Guidelines for Implementation of Duties and Administration of Religious Courts". It has been revised in 2006, 2010, and 2013. It was incomplete norm because Marriage Law does not explain the division of community property in polygamous marriages. It only contains the requirements of polygamy, so that it is not legal and could not protect the wife. The research method used by the author in this study was normative or doctrinal legal research. It was concluded that division of community property is the absolute requirement in polygamy, in order to protect the rights of wives. It is based on Marriage Law, Compilation of Islamic Law and Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number KMA/032/SK/IV/2006. In terms of polygamy, Religious Courts also provide a verdict in the form of stipulation of community property. This is in line with the concept of legal protection which provides protection through legal certainty and guarantees justice for wives.
展开▼
机译：婚姻法第35条（1）条国家：社区财产是一对夫妇在婚姻期间收购的财产。 KHI第94条规定了一聚中婚姻中的社区财产是分开的和独立的。然而，有一个意见，指出第94条对第一任妻子不公平，因为他们收到了其他妻子中的最少部分。事实上，第一任妻子陪同她的丈夫更长的时间，并继续在下婚姻中陪他。当然，它被认为是不公平的，因为第一个妻子遭受最多，特别是在精神状况方面，因为没有女人实际上愿意与其他女性分享她的丈夫。宗教法院的技术管理和技术指南在宗教法院基于印度尼西亚最高法院主席的决定：KMA / 032 / SK / IV / 2006关于实施“书籍二指引履行职责和宗教法院管理“。它已于2006年，2010年和2013年进行了修订。它是不完整的常态，因为婚姻法没有解释婚姻婚姻中的社区财产司。它只包含多糖的要求，因此它不合理，无法保护妻子。本研究中的作者使用的研究方法是规范性或教义法律研究。它的结论是，社区财产的划分是一夫多妻制的绝对要求，以保护妻子的权利。它是基于婚姻法，伊斯兰法律汇编和印度尼西亚共和国的最高法院决定KMA / 032 / SK / IV / 2006。就多哥而言，宗教法院还以社区财产规定的形式提供判决。这符合法律保护的概念，通过法律确定性提供保护，并保证妻子正义。
展开▼
