...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Validity of a two-item physical activity questionnaire for assessing attainment of physical activity guidelines in youth
【24h】

Validity of a two-item physical activity questionnaire for assessing attainment of physical activity guidelines in youth

机译:用于评估青少年体育活动准则的两件物体活动问卷的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background As physical activity is important for health and well-being, it is essential to monitor population prevalence of physical activity. Surveillance is dependent on the use of valid and reliable measurement tools. The PACE+ questionnaire is used globally in youth and has acceptable reliability; however it has not been validated in a European sample. The purpose of this study is to validate this instrument in a sample of 10–18 year old Irish youth. Methods Participants (n?=?419, 45.7?% male) completed the PACE+ two-item questionnaire and were asked to wear an Actigraph accelerometer for eight consecutive days. Freedson cut-points were used to estimate moderate to vigorous physical activity from accelerometer counts. Analyses compared self-report and accelerometry data in participants with (1) ≥5 and (2) seven valid accelerometer days. Calculations were performed for the whole sample, and were stratified by sex and school level (primary; post-primary). Results Spearman correlations between self-reported physical activity levels and accelerometry derived minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day were small (r?=?0.27; seven valid days) to moderate (r?=?0.34; ≥5 valid days). Higher correlations were found in older participants (post-primary r?=?0.39; primary r?=?0.24) and females (r?=?0.39; males r?=?0.27) using ≥5 valid days. The agreement level was high (68–96?%). The accuracy of classifying those not meeting the guidelines (specificity) was moderate to high (59–100?%). Conclusions The PACE+ self-report instrument has acceptable validity for assessing non-achievement of the adolescent physical activity recommendations. The validity is higher in females and increases with age. The continued use of the tool is recommended and will allow for comparability between studies, tracking of physical activity over time including trends in youth population prevalence.
机译:背景作为身体活动对健康和福祉至关重要,必须监测人口普遍的身体活动。监视取决于使用有效和可靠的测量工具。节奏+问卷在全球范围内使用青少年并具有可接受的可靠性;但它尚未在欧洲样本中验证。本研究的目的是在10-18岁的爱尔兰青年的样本中验证该仪器。方法参与者(n?= 419,45.7?%男性)完成了步伐+两项问卷,并被要求连续八天佩戴一个手工率加速度计。 Freedson切割点用于估计中等至加速度计数的剧烈体力活动。分析与(1)≥5和(2)七个有效加速度计天数的参与者中的自我报告和加速度数据进行比较。对整个样品进行计算,并被性和学校水平分层(小学;后初级)。结果自我报告的身体活性水平与加速度之间的相关性来自每天中等剧烈的身体活动的分钟(R?= 0.27;七个有效的日)至中等(r?=?0.34;≥5个有效的日子)。在较旧的参与者中发现了较高的相关性(后初级R?= 0.39;主要r?= 0.24)和女性(r?= 0.39;男性R?= 0.27)使用≥5个有效的日子。协议水平很高(68-96?%)。分类不符合指南(特异性)的准确性(特异性)中度至高(59-100?%)。结论步伐+自我报告仪器有可接受的有效性,用于评估非成就青少年体力活动建议。雌性的有效性较高,随着年龄的增长而增加。建议继续使用该工具,并允许研究之间的可比性,随着时间的推移跟踪身体活动,包括青年人口普遍存在的趋势。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号