...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Interaction Effects of Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System and Cost/Probability Biases on Social Anxiety
【24h】

Interaction Effects of Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System and Cost/Probability Biases on Social Anxiety

机译：行为抑制系统/行为激活系统的互动效应及成本/概率偏差对社会焦虑的影响

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction Social anxiety disorder (SAD) symptoms are maintained by cognitive biases, which are overestimations of the severity and likelihood of negative social events (cost/probability biases), and by sensitivity to rewards and punishments that are determined according to behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation systems (BIS/BAS). Cost/probability biases might activate the behavioral immune system and exacerbate the avoidance of social events. Earlier studies have proposed that low BIS or high BAS decrease SAD symptoms; BIS/BAS may even change the effects of cognitive biases on SAD symptoms. Hence, the current study investigates the interaction effects of BIS/BAS and cost/probability biases on SAD symptoms. Method Seventy-six Japanese undergraduate students completed the Japanese version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), which comprises Fear and Avoidance subscales, the BIS/BAS Scale, and the Social Cost Probability Scale. Results A multiple regression analysis was performed to examine whether cost/probability biases, BIS/BAS, and their interactions affected SAD symptoms; following this, the main effects of cost bias and BIS were determined for LSAS-Fear (β = .64, p .001; β = .33, p .01) and LSAS-Avoidance (β = .49, p .001; β = .35, p .01). The interaction effect between cost bias and BAS was significant for LSAS-Avoidance (β = ?.32, p .05). Simple slope analysis showed that the slope of cost bias was significant for low-BAS individuals (β = .77, p .001) but not for high-BAS individuals (β = ?.21, n.s.). The interaction effect between probability bias and BAS was significant for LSAS-Avoidance (β = .40, p .01) as well. Further, simple slope analysis revealed that the slope of probability bias was significant for low-BAS individuals (β = ?.53, p .05) but not for high-BAS individuals (β = .17, n.s.). Discussion The study found interesting results with respect to the avoidance of social events. Low-BAS individuals with high cost or low probability biases regarding social events may have a tendency to avoid social events. In contrast, if high-BAS individuals overestimate the cost of social events or underestimate the probability of social events, their anticipation of rewards might prevent them from avoiding social events.
机译：引言社交焦虑症（悲伤）症状由认知偏差保持，这是对负面社交事件（成本/概率偏见）的严重程度和可能性的高估，以及根据行为抑制/行为激活确定的奖励和惩罚的敏感性系统（BIS / BAS）。成本/概率偏差可能激活行为免疫系统，加剧了避免社交活动。早期的研究提出，低BIS或高BAC降低悲伤症状; BIS / BAC甚至可能会改变认知偏见对悲伤症状的影响。因此，目前的研究调查了BIS / BAS和成本/概率偏差对悲伤症状的相互作用效应。方法七十六日本本科学生完成了日本版本的Liebowitz社交焦虑秤（LSA），包括恐惧和避免分量，BIS / BAS规模和社会成本概率规模。结果进行多元回归分析，以检查是否有成本/概率偏差，BIS / BAS和它们的相互作用影响了悲伤的症状;在此之后，测定成本偏差和BIS的主要效果是针对LSAS-FEAR的（β= .64，P <.001;β= .33，P <.01）和LSAS-避免（β= .49，P < .001;β= .35，p <.01）。成本偏差和BAS之间的相互作用效果对于LSAS避免（β=Δ32，p <.05）显着。简单的斜率分析表明，成本偏差的斜率对于低压个体（β= .77，P <.001）而言是显着的，但不是高BAS个体（β=Δ21，N.S.）。概率偏差和BAS之间的相互作用效果也显着对LSAS-避免（β= .40，P <.01）。此外，简单的斜率分析显示概率偏置的斜率对于低压个体（β=β.53，P <.05）而言是显着的，但不是高BAS个体（β= .17，N.S.）。讨论该研究发现关于避免社交活动的有趣结果。关于社交事件的高成本或低概率偏差的低压个人可能具有避免社交事件的趋势。相比之下，如果高地个人高估社交事件的成本或低估社会事件的概率，他们的期望可能会阻止他们避免社会事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号