首页> 外文期刊>Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine >Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Which one is more effective during ambulance transport?
【24h】

Manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Which one is more effective during ambulance transport?

机译:手动心肺复苏与机械心肺复苏术:在救护车运输过程中哪一个更有效?

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Although studies in the field of emergency medical services (EMS) generally compare survival and hospital discharge rates, there are not many studies measuring the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In this study, we aimed to compare the mechanical chest compression device and paramedics in terms of CPR quality.
机译:目的:虽然在紧急医疗服务领域(EMS)的研究通常比较生存和医院排放率,但没有许多测量心肺复苏质量的研究(CPR)。 在这项研究中,我们旨在在CPR质量方面比较机械胸部压缩装置和护理人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号