• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies >People’s will or the central government’s plan? The shape of contemporary Chinese local governance
【24h】

People’s will or the central government’s plan? The shape of contemporary Chinese local governance

机译：人们的意志还是中央政府的计划？ 当代中国地方治理的形状

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the wake of 18~(th) and 19~(th?)CPC Central Committees’ reforms on “social governance,” this paper will explore subsequent developments in local governance in China. This is an appropriate focus because earlier research has largely tended to overlook the different ways that local governments behave in balancing the requirements of upper-level, national government with the needs and will of society. By using interviews and participant observation to examine the case of Xicheng District Beijing, this paper finds that, when local government faces pressure from central government, it tends to downplay consideration of the people’s voice and instead it uses monetary compensation to appease people’s anger at not being listened to. However, when local government is afforded more freedom, it is more likely to try and address people’s needs and demands and reconcile these with central government’s plan, so as to balance the needs of the two. The analysis of the post-2012 reforms identifies three Project Types to illustrate different approaches to local governance. Owing to government’s dominant role, Types One and Two are more akin to what empowerment theory dubs “collaborative betterment.” In contrast, Type Three projects give local communities far greater say in determining policy priorities and implementation methods. For this reason, they broadly resonate with the notion of “collaborative empowerment,” although ultimately government remains a veto-player. A further key finding is that local governance is not only shaped by the central government’s plan, nor the demands of society, but to a significant degree, by the mediating role of local government officials.
机译：在18〜（次）和19〜过后（日？）中共中央政治局委员的‘社会治理’的改革本文将探讨在中国的地方治理后续发展。这是一个适当的焦点，因为早期的研究已经在很大程度上往往忽视了不同的方式，当地政府在平衡上一级，国家政府与需求的要求的行为和社会的意志。通过使用访谈和参与式观察研究北京西城区的情况下，即，当地方政府面临着来自中央政府的压力本文发现，也容易淡化考虑人民群众的声音，而是它在不使用货币补偿安抚人们愤怒被听取。但是，如果当地政府提供更多的自由，它更可能去尝试和解决人们的需求和要求，并协调这与中央政府的计划，以平衡二者的需求。在2012年后的改革确定了三个项目类型分析，说明了不同地方治理。由于政府的主导作用，类型一和二更类似于什么权力理论配音“协同改善。”相反，类型三个项目给当地社区更大的发言权在确定政策重点和实施方法。为此，他们广泛使用的概念共鸣“的协作能力，”虽然最终政府仍然一票否决玩家。另一个关键的发现是，地方治理不仅是中央政府的计划形，也不是社会的要求，但是到了显著的程度，地方政府官员的调解作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号