首页> 外文期刊>Geosphere >Animated reconstructions of the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic northward migration of Australia, and implications for the generation of east Australian mafic magmatism: REPLY
【24h】

Animated reconstructions of the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic northward migration of Australia, and implications for the generation of east Australian mafic magmatism: REPLY

机译:澳大利亚新生代北方迁移的晚期白垩纪的动画重建,对东澳大利亚MAFIC Magmatism的产生:答复

获取原文
           

摘要

We appreciate the opportunity to discuss our paper on the Cenozoic mafic magmatism of eastern Australia and potential relationships to plate motion and are thankful to Musgrave and Schmidt (2019) for bringing the uncertainties and inconsistencies of Jones et al. (2017) to our attention. The comments from Musgrave and Schmidt (2019) focus on the paleomagnetic record of Australian plate motion, so, to begin, we note that Jones et al. (2017) did not include new paleomagnetic data. Instead, the paper presented new 40Ar/39Ar results from east Australian mafic rocks and evaluated them in light of tectonic reconstruction circuits compiled by Seton et al. (2012). To reiterate the original motivation behind our paper, we created animations from previous tectonic reconstructions to examine spatial-temporal relationships between east Australian magmatism and tectonic processes such as the opening of the Tasman and Coral Seas and collision of the Ontong Java Plateau (OJP) with the Solomon Islands. In particular, we examined (1) the age and location of mafic magmatism in eastern Australia with respect to tectonic reshuffling in the southwest pacific; (2) possible formation mechanisms of magmatic provinces in eastern Australia; and (3) the relationship between the latitude of the Australian plate according to a global moving hotspot reference frame (GMHRF; Doubrovine et al., 2012) and different apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) for Australia using previously published paleomagnetic data from Idnurm (1985), Embleton (1981), and Embleton and McElhinny (1982).
机译:我们很高兴有机会在澳大利亚东部的新生代MAFIC Magmatism讨论我们的论文,并潜在地与板式运动的关系,并感谢Musgrave和Schmidt(2019),以带来Jones等人的不确定性和不一致。 (2017)我们的注意力。从Musgrave和Schmidt(2019)的评论重点关注澳大利亚板块运动的古磁性记录,所以,开始,我们注意到Jones等人。 (2017)不包括新的旧古磁性数据。相反,该论文提出了来自东澳大利亚MAFIC岩石的新的40AR / 39AR结果,并根据由Seton等人编制的构造重建电路来评估它们。 (2012)。要重申纸质背后的原始动机,我们从先前的构造重建创建了动画,以检查东澳大利亚岩浆学和构造过程之间的空间关系,如塔曼和珊瑚海的开放,以及Ontong Java Plateau(OJP)的碰撞所罗门群岛。特别是,我们审查了(1)澳大利亚东部地区麦克风岩浆广告的年龄和地点,在西南太平洋地区的构造补品; (2)澳大利亚东部岩浆省的可能形成机制; (3)根据全球移动热点参考帧(GMHRF; Doubrovine等,2012)和澳大利亚的不同明显的极性漫游路径(APWPS),使用先前发布的古磁性数据从Idnurm( 1985年),Embleton(1981)和Embleton和Mcelhinny(1982)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号