• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January–July 2020
【24h】

Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January–July 2020

机译：要求印度尼西亚政府对Covid-19大流行的公共政策回应：1月至7月20日期间的黑匣子分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives: Indonesia responded the COVID-19 pandemic slowly these last months. The recent reports shown that the rate performance of Indonesian government in handling COVID-19 posits at the 4th worst all over the world. Meanwhile, through responsive, strict, and strategic policy, some Asia countries pushed the elimination case by doing lockdown. This paper questioned how government respond this pandemic, tried to track down the unresponsive and slow decisions, and analyze them comprehensively trough policy system framework. Moreover, we also considered a few feasible and strategic recommendations to accelerate the pandemic responding. Methods: To visualize the anatomy of problems in handling these pandemic responses, this work applied Easton's black box analysis in formulating and introducing public policy. The black box analysis would help us to portray and understood the interests, rationalities, and priorities behind introducing public policies which was implemented to handle this health problem. Besides, the policy triangle framework was used to analyze how environment influenced key actor in making decision. Results: This analysis study discovered the conflict interests in formulating and implementing public policy in handling COVID-19. The public policies are negotiated, discussed, and formulated under black box that ignore transparency, and other good governance principles. Consequently, the substance of public policy represents a certain interest of policy makers, that may conflict with the others and often contradict to the constitutional-based public interests, that is public health. It was impacted the emergence of messy and uncoordinated institutions that implement the conflicted policies. Undeniably, this situation may spark counter-productive ways, attitudes, and actions of people in responding those ambiguous policies. Therefore, this work recommended revising the coherences norms and public policies; reforming the ministry of health in public health's paradigm context; and improving the integration and coordination of cross related institutions, creating a single data on public health, and changing a new paradigm of people, including improving collective awareness in responding and handling COVID-19 appropriately.
机译：目标：印度尼西亚最后几个月回应了Covid-19大流行。最近的报道表明，印度尼西亚政府在世界各地的第四次达到Covid-19 Posits方面的速度表现。同时，通过响应，严格和战略政策，一些亚洲国家通过锁定推动消除案件。本文质疑政府如何应对这一流行病，试图追踪无响应和缓慢的决策，并分析全面的低谷政策系统框架。此外，我们还考虑了一些可行和战略性的建议，以加速大流行响应。方法：在处理这些大流行反应方面的问题的解剖，这项工作应用于配制和介绍公共政策的伊斯顿的黑匣子分析。黑匣子分析将有助于我们描绘并理解引入实施该健康问题的公共政策的兴趣，理性和优先事项。此外，策略三角形框架用于分析环境如何影响任务的关键演员。结果：该分析研究发现了在处理Covid-19方面制定和实施公共政策的冲突利益。在忽视透明度和其他良好治理原则的黑匣子下，讨论和制定公共政策。因此，公共政策的实质是政策制定者的一定利益，可能与其他人发生冲突，并且通常与宪法为基础的公共利益相矛盾，即公共卫生。它受到影响的杂乱和未交断机构的出现，该机构实施了冲突政策。无可否认，这种情况可能会引发人们反应这些含糊不清政策的反向效力方式，态度和行动。因此，这项工作建议修改一致性规范和公共政策;在公共卫生范式上改革卫生部;并提高交叉相关机构的整合和协调，创造一个关于公共卫生的单一数据，以及改变新的人的新范式，包括改善对响应和处理Covid-19的集体意识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号