...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature
【24h】

Dyadic Coping in Couples: A Conceptual Integration and a Review of the Empirical Literature

机译：夫妻的二元应对：对经验文学的概念整合和综述

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present review on dyadic coping (DC) aims at providing a critical integration of both the conceptual and empirical DC literature and overcoming the limitations of past reviews by (a) describing, comparing, and integrating all the DC models, (b) presenting and integrating findings from studies based on DC models, and (c) suggesting directions for further research. The DC models identified and compared include: The congruence model (Revenson, 1994 ), the relationship-focused model (Coyne and Smith, 1991 ; O'Brien and DeLongis, 1996 ), the communal coping model (Lyons et al., 1998 ), the systemic-transactional model (Bodenmann, 1995 , 1997 ), the relational-cultural model (Kayser et al., 2007 ), and the developmental-contextual coping model (Berg and Upchurch, 2007 ). After discussing each DC model, we advance a conceptual integration of all models, which serves as the framework to organize the review of the empirical literature. This integration includes the following DC dimensions: (a) Stress Communication, (b) Positive DC by One Partner (supportive DC, empathic responding, delegated DC, active engagement), (c) Positive Conjoint DC (common, collaborative, communal, mutual responsiveness); (d) Negative DC by One Partner (protective buffering, overprotection, and hostility/ambivalence), and (e) Negative Conjoint DC (common negative DC, disengaged avoidance). Developmental, relational, and contextual variables are included as factors shaping DC. To be included in the empirical review, articles had to be published in or a peer-reviewed journal in English and/or German before 2017 and include an original empirical study guided by one of the DC models. The review included 139 studies and, with the exception of the congruence model whose findings were discussed separately, findings were presented for overall DC and each of the dimensions identified in the conceptual integration. Findings were grouped also according to whether the stressor related or not to a medical or mental health condition. Demographic and cultural factors affecting DC were discussed. Overall, the empirical review suggests that in Western couples, positive individual, and conjoint DC forms, taken together or separately, have individual and relational benefits for couples coping with stress in general and/or mental health or medical stressors. Research on DC can be expanded to include other populations and stressors and use improved designs.
机译：关于Dyadic Coping（DC）的本综述旨在提供概念和经验DC文献的关键整合，并克服过去评论的限制（a）描述，比较和整合所有DC模型，（b）呈现和基于DC模型的研究与（c）建议进一步研究的方向集成研究结果。确定和比较的DC模型包括：同载模型（REVENSON，1994），以关系为中心的模型（COYNE和SMITH，1991; O'BRIEN和DELONGIS，1996），公共应对模式（Lyons等，1998） ，全身交易模型（Bodenmann，1995,1997），关系 - 文化模型（Kayser等，2007）和发育 - 情境应对模式（Berg和Upchurch，2007）。在讨论每个DC型号之后，我们推进了所有型号的概念整合，它是组织经验文献审查的框架。该集成包括以下直流尺寸：（a）压力通信，（b）由一个合作伙伴的正面DC（支持DC，Sompathic响应，委托DC，主动参与），（C）正联合DC（普通，协作，公共，相互响应性）; （d）由一个合作伙伴（保护缓冲，过度保护，敌意/矛盾），（e）负联合DC（普通负面直流，脱离避免）。包括发展，关系和上下文变量作为塑造DC的因素。要纳入经验审查，条款必须在2017年之前在英语和/或德语中公布或同行审查的期刊，并包括一个直流型号的原始实证研究。该综述包括139项研究，除了分别讨论的同势模型，还介绍了整体DC的结果和在概念整合中确定的每个维度。还根据压力源和心理健康状况或心理健康状况的压力源分组分组。讨论了影响DC的人口和文化因素。总体而言，经验综述表明，在西方夫妻，积极的个人和联合DC形式，共同或单独参加，为夫妻接受一般和/或心理健康或医疗压力源的夫妻的个人和关系益处。可以扩展到DC的研究以包括其他人群和压力源，并使用改进的设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号