...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >A new bottom-up method for the standard analysis and comparison of workforce capacity in mental healthcare planning: Demonstration study in the Australian Capital Territory
【24h】

A new bottom-up method for the standard analysis and comparison of workforce capacity in mental healthcare planning: Demonstration study in the Australian Capital Territory

机译：澳大利亚资本领域的标准分析和比较标准分析和比较的新方法：澳大利亚资本领域的示范研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The aims of this study are to evaluate and describe mental health workforce and capacity, and to describe the relationship between workforce capacity and patterns of care in local areas. We conducted a comparative demonstration study of the applicability of an internationally validated standardised service classification instrument—the Description and Evaluation of Services and Directories—DESDE-LTC) using the emerging mental health ecosystems research (MHESR) approach. Using DESDE-LTC as the framework, and drawing from international occupation classifications, the workforce was classified according to characteristics including the type of care provided and professional background. Our reference area was the Australian Capital Territory, which we compared with two other urban districts in Australia (Sydney and South East Sydney) and three benchmark international health districts (Helsinki-Uusima (Finland), Verona (Italy) and Gipuzkoa (Spain)). We also compared our data with national level data where available. The Australian and Finnish regions had a larger and more highly skilled workforce than the southern European regions. The pattern of workforce availability and profile varied, even within the same country, at the local level. We found significant differences between regional rates of identified rates of psychiatrists and psychologists, and national averages. Using a standardised classification instrument at the local level, and our occupational groupings, we were able to assess the available workforce and provide information relevant to planners about the actual capacity of the system. Data obtained at local level is critical to providing planners with reliable data to inform their decision making.
机译：本研究的目标是评估和描述心理健康劳动力和能力，并描述劳动力能力与当地护理模式之间的关系。我们使用新兴精神卫生生态系统研究（MHESER）方法进行了对国际经过的标准化服务分类仪器的适用性研究和评估服务和目录-DEDE-LTC的比较示范研究。使用Desde-LTC作为框架，并从国际职业分类中绘制，劳动力根据包括提供的护理类型和专业背景的特征进行分类。我们的参考领域是澳大利亚资本领域，与澳大利亚（悉尼和东南悉尼）和三个基准国际卫生区（赫尔辛基 - uusima（芬兰），维罗纳（意大利）和Gipuzkoa（西班牙）和Gipuzkoa（西班牙）相比，我们相比。我们还将我们的数据与现有国家一级数据进行了比较。澳大利亚和芬兰地区的劳动力比南欧地区更大，更高度熟练的劳动力。劳动力可用性和个人资料的模式甚至在同一国内变化，即在地方一级。我们发现精神科医生和心理学家的区域率和国家平均水平之间的巨大差异。在地方一级使用标准化的分类仪器和我们的职业分组，我们能够评估可用的员工，并提供与规划人员有关系统实际容量的信息。在本地级别获得的数据对于为具有可靠数据提供规划者来说是至关重要的，以告知其决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号