...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons – results from an online survey in Germany
【24h】

Awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons – results from an online survey in Germany

机译：对骨科和创伤外科医生之间的掠夺性期刊和开放式公开发布的认识 - 来自德国在线调查的结果

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Along with emerging open access journals (OAJ) predatory journals increasingly appear. As they harm accurate and good scientific research, we aimed to examine the awareness of predatory journals and open access publishing among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons. In an online survey between August and December 2019 the knowledge on predatory journals and OAJ was tested with a hyperlink made available to the participants via the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (DGOU) email distributor. Three hundred fifty orthopaedic and trauma surgeons participated, of which 291 complete responses (231 males (79.4%), 54 females (18.6%) and 5?N/A (2.0%)) were obtained. 39.9% were aware of predatory journals. However, 21.0% knew about the “Directory of Open Access Journals” (DOAJ) as a register for non-predatory open access journals. The level of profession (e.g. clinic director, consultant) (p?=?0.018) influenced the awareness of predatory journals. Interestingly, participants aware of predatory journals had more often been listed as corresponding authors (p??0.001) and were well published as first or last author (p??0.001). Awareness of OAJ was masked when journal selection options did not to provide any information on the editorial board, the peer review process or the publication costs. The impending hazard of predatory journals is unknown to many orthopaedic and trauma surgeons. Early stage clinical researchers must be trained to differentiate between predatory and scientifically accurate journals.
机译：随着新兴的开放式期刊（OAJ）掠夺性期刊越来越多地出现。由于它们损害了准确和良好的科学研究，我们旨在审查骨科和创伤外科医生的掠夺性期刊的意识和开放式公开。在2019年8月至12月之间的在线调查中，通过德国骨科和创伤外科（DGOU）电子邮件经销商，通过向参与者提供的超链接来测试掠夺性期刊和OAJ的知识。三百五十个骨科和创伤外科医生参与其中，其中291个完全反应（231个男性（79.4％），54名女性（18.6％）和5？N / A（2.0％））。 39.9％意识到掠夺性期刊。但是，21.0％关于“开放式学报”（DOAJ）作为非掠夺性开放式期刊的注册。专业水平（例如诊所主任，顾问）（P？= 0.018）影响了掠夺性期刊的认识。有趣的是，参与者意识到掠夺性期刊更常被列为相应的作者（p？＆ 0.001），并且作为第一或第一作者发表优质（p？＆ 0.001）。当日记选项选项没有提供关于编辑委员会，同行评审过程或出版成本的任何信息时，对OAJ的认识被屏蔽。许多骨科和创伤外科医生迫使掠夺性期刊的危险是未知的。必须培训早期临床研究人员，以区分掠夺性和科学准确的期刊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号