...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Business Research >Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism
【24h】

Pragmatism as a Supportive Paradigm for the Mixed Research Approach Conceptualizing the Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Stances of Pragmatism

机译：实用主义作为一个支持性范式的混合研究方法，概念化了实用主义的本体学，认识论和神学立场

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The emergence of the mixed research approach has been accompanied by searching for a philosophy that legitimates mixing quantitative and qualitative methods in one research. Many researchers consider pragmatism as the most common philosophical justification for the mixed research approach; however, pragmatism is criticized as a philosophy in general and also as philosophical support for the mixed research approach especially for not addressing the differing assumptions of the quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Trying to overcome this criticism, the current research is mainly concerned with presenting pragmatism as a coherent, integrated paradigm by conceptualizing its ontological, epistemological and axiological stances. The researcher coins three new terminologies: the reality cycle, the double-faced knowledge, and the necessary bias principle. These philosophical stances combine both the quantitative and qualitative paradigms' points of view as two integrated, not conflicting philosophies.
机译：混合研究方法的出现伴随着寻求合法化在一项研究中的定量和定性方法的理念的哲学。许多研究人员认为务实是混合研究方法最常见的哲学理由;然而，实用主义被批评为一般哲学，也是对混合研究方法的哲学支持，特别是没有解决定量和定性范式的不同假设。试图克服这种批评，目前的研究主要涉及通过概念化其本体论，认识论和神学立场来呈现实用主义作为连贯的综合范式。研究人员硬币三个新的术语：现实周期，双面知识和必要的偏见原则。这些哲学立场将定量和定性范式的视角与两个综合，而不是矛盾的哲学相结合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号