• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World >Social Networks in Later Life: Similarities and Differences between Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual Older Adults
【24h】

Social Networks in Later Life: Similarities and Differences between Sexual-Minority and Heterosexual Older Adults

机译：在后期生活中的社交网络：性少数群体和异性恋老年人之间的相似之处和差异

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Community-based research suggests that lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) older adults are more socially isolated than their heterosexual counterparts. However, little is known about how social networks in late adulthood differ between LGB and heterosexual people at the population level. Using data from the 2015–2016 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project ( n = 3,929), the authors compare the size, frequency of contact, composition, diversity, and density of core discussion networks as well as family and friend support across sexual-orientation groups. The authors find that LGB people share a few network characteristics with their heterosexual counterparts, including network size, frequency of contact with network members, and proportion of nonspousal kin members in the network. However, their networks are less likely to include intimate partners, are more likely to include friends, and have lower diversity and density. LGB people also report lower family support but higher friend support than heterosexual people.
机译：基于社区的研究表明，女同性恋，同性恋和双性恋（LGB）老年人比他们的异性恋同行更为社会。但是，关于在人口水平的LGB和异性恋人之间的晚期社交网络如何众所周知。作者使用来自2015-2016国家社会生活，健康和老化项目（n = 3,929）的数据（n = 3,929），比较核心讨论网络的联系，组成，多样性和密度的大小，频率以及家庭和朋友的支持性定位群体。作者发现LGB人员与其异性恋对应物共享一些网络特征，包括网络大小，与网络成员的接触频率，以及网络中的非佩斯基成员的比例。然而，他们的网络不太可能包括亲密合作伙伴，更有可能包括朋友，并且具有更低的多样性和密度。 LGB人们还报告了较低的家庭支持，但比异性恋人民更高的朋友支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号