【24h】

Inbox

机译:收件箱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I always read Discover from cover to cover and find the articles enlightening. Occasionally, however, I think the authors show that they are too enamored of what I think of as the "gee whiz" factor of new science advances. As a case in point, the article "Future Wear" paints a wonderful picture of the possibilities of electronic textiles. What is not mentioned is what is to be done with those textiles once the electronics stop working or the fabric tears or wears out. Will there be a mechanism in place to safely recycle or dispose of electronic textiles? I would encourage your writers to consider all the "what ifs" of science advances as a part of the articles they create.
机译:我总是从头到尾阅读“发现”,并找到启发性的文章。但是,有时候,我认为作者表明,他们对新科学发展的“奇才”因素过于迷恋。作为一个恰当的例子,“ Future Wear”一文描述了电子纺织品的可能性。没有提到的是一旦电子设备停止工作或织物撕裂或磨损,该如何处理这些纺织品。是否有机制可以安全地回收或处理电子纺织品?我鼓励您的作家将所有科学发展的“假设”作为他们撰写的文章的一部分来考虑。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Discover》 |2018年第6期|7-7|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号