...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >GHG Emissions and the Rural-Urban Divide. A Carbon Footprint Analysis Based on the German Official Income and Expenditure Survey
【24h】

GHG Emissions and the Rural-Urban Divide. A Carbon Footprint Analysis Based on the German Official Income and Expenditure Survey

机译：温室气体排放与城乡鸿沟。基于德国官方收支调查的碳足迹分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Will climate change be mitigated automatically by ongoing processes of urbanization as proposed by the "dense cities" hypothesis? Our answer is based on the German official income and expenditure survey (EVS) of 2013, which allow us to disaggregate total household expenditures into 44 consumer good categories (COICOP) and their respective GHG intensities. Results show that the density effect of cities saves some greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Germany, but singularisation of households, higher Incomes and greater consumption opportunities in cities work in the opposite direction. Thus, smaller and larger municipalities are more or less on par with each other in terms of per capita emissions. Rural households are found to be more affected by environmental taxes which are imposed on direct rather than on indirect energy use in the course of German "Energiewende" policy reform. This is discussed in the article as a rural-urban social equity problem.
机译：如“密集城市”假说所提出的，城市化进程将自动缓解气候变化吗？我们的答案基于2013年德国官方收支调查（EVS），这使我们能够将家庭总支出分为44种消费品类别（COICOP）及其各自的温室气体强度。结果表明，城市的密度效应在德国节省了一些温室气体（GHG）排放，但家庭的单一化，更高的收入和更大的消费机会却在相反的方向上起作用。因此，规模较小的市政当局在人均排放量上或多或少彼此相等。人们发现，农村家庭受到环境税的影响更大，在德国“ Energiewende”政策改革过程中，环境税是直接税而不是间接能源税。本文将其作为城乡社会公平问题进行讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号