...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Delimitation of ecological corridors between conservation units in the Brazilian Cerrado using a GIS and AHP approach
【24h】

Delimitation of ecological corridors between conservation units in the Brazilian Cerrado using a GIS and AHP approach

机译:使用GIS和AHP方法划定巴西Cerrado的保护单元之间的生态走廊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Brazilian Cerrado is a biodiversity hotspot of global importance; however, it is fragmented. The objective of this study is to identify suitable areas for ecological corridors (ECs) between two conservation units (CUs) located in the Espinhaco Range Biosphere Reserve (ERBR) in the Cerrado biome, Brazil, based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), least-cost path (LCP) methods and landscape metrics. The methodology was based on the use of the AHP as a decision-making tool. Using the AHP, relative weights were attributed to the criteria used in the construction of land use, occupation, terrain slope and permanent preservation area (PPA) maps, which were then used for the delimitation of ECs in a GIS environment based on the LCP approach and landscape metrics. The results included a proposal of three ECs, listed as A, B and C, with areas of 34.28, 27.04 and 28.80 km2, respectively. The use of the AHP minimizes the subjectivity of the criteria used. The analyses identified that the ECs had similar habitat quality to that of the conservation units. EC-A presented the largest area of natural vegetation. EC-B presents comparable vegetation to that of EC-A and the shortest connection. EC-C contains the largest area of monoculture and is the least suitable option, given the choice of ECs. Additional studies using other spatial algorithms should be used to find paths to optimize distances and costs for establishing ECs in Brazil and/or other world ecoregions.
机译:巴西·库拉多州是全球重要性的生物多样性热点;但是,它是碎片化的。本研究的目的是在巴西的espinhaco范围生物圈储备(ERBR)的两个保护单位(CUS)之间识别生态走廊(ECS)的合适区域,基于分析等级过程(AHP),最少-Cost路径(LCP)方法和横向度量。该方法基于使用AHP作为决策工具。使用AHP,相对权重归因于用于建造土地使用,占用,地形坡度和永久性保存区域(PPA)地图的标准,然后基于LCP方法将ECS的划定在GIS环境中和景观度量。结果包括三个EC,列为A,B和C的提案,分别为34.28,27.04和28.80 km2。使用AHP的使用最小化了所使用的标准的主观性。分析确定ECS对保护单位的栖息地质量相似。 EC-A呈现了最大的天然植被领域。 EC-B向EC-A和最短连接呈现了可比的植被。鉴于ECS的选择,EC-C包含最大的单一文化区域,是最不合适的选择。使用其他空间算法的其他研究应用于寻找可优化在巴西和/或其他世界eCoregions建立ECS的距离和成本的路径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号